What was new on START Web site?
May, 2001
May 30, 2001
The New York Times reported on Monday, that to win Russia's cooperation in scrapping the 1972 Antiballistic Missile Treaty and deployment of missile defenses, the Bush administration was preparing a broad offer of arms purchases, military aid and joint antimissile exercises. Russians officials repeatedly insisted that the ABM Treaty be honored:
- Military Analysis: Russia's Role in Missile Defense, (by Michael R. Gordon, The New York Times, May 30, 2001)
- Why American "Patriots" Need Russian S-300?, - in Russian, (by Leonid Savchenko, SMI.ru, May 30, 2001)
- Diplomacy May Be the Best Defense, (The Moscow Times, May 30, 2001)
- Igor Ivanov: Exchange of S-300 for Position on ABM Treaty is Out of Question, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev, Strana.ru, May 29, 2001)
- With the Shield, Not On the Shield, - in Russian, (by Andrei Lebedev, Dmitri Safonov, Izvestia, May 29, 2001)
- Will S-300 be Used to Break the ABM Treaty? - in Russian, (by Yelena Shesternina, Mikhail Khodarenok, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 29, 2001)
- George W. Bush Praised Russian Missiles, - in Russian, (by Alyona Miklashevskaya, Ivan Safronov, Kommersant, May 29, 2001)
- Farewell to Arms, - in Russian, (Vesti.Ru, May 29, 2001)
- Russia Continues to Oppose Scrapping ABM Treaty, (by Michael Wines, The New York Times, May 29, 2001)
- U.S. May Buy Russian Technology Offer Planned to Ease Opposition to Missile Defense System, (by Vernon Loeb, The Washington Post, Tuesday, May 29, 2001; Page A11)
- Moscow: We Won't Scrap ABM, (by Simon Saradzhyan, The Moscow Times, May 29, 2001)
- U.S. Plans Offer to Russia to End ABM Treaty Dispute, (by David E. Sanger and Thom Shanker, The New York Times, May 28, 2001)
- Sell S-300, Sign a New Treaty, - in Russian, (by Viktor Bezborodov, SMI.ru, May 28, 2001) - a comment by Andrei Piontkovsky, Director of the Center for Strategic Studies.
President Bush's plans on NMD deployment face rougher sledding. The shift of the Senate to Democratic control elevates some of the strongest skeptics of the administration's drive for a missile defense system, putting Senator Carl Levin of Michigan in line to be chairman of the Armed Services Committee and Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. in line to be chairman of Foreign Relations.
- Senate Against NMD, - in Russian, (by Maxim Trudolyubov, Vedomosti, May 29, 2001)
- Turncoat Jeffords, or George W. Bush's Mistake, - in Russian, (by Sergey Eduardov, Utro.ru, May 29, 2001)
- Democrats Threaten Bush's Missile Shield, (BBC News, May 28, 2001)
- Bush Can Lose Control Over Senate. And NMD as Well., - in Russian, (SMI.ru, May 24, 2001)
- Power Shift Puts Democrats In Position For Missile Defense Battle, (by Kerry Gildea, Defense Daily, May 25, 2001)
- Bush Agenda Now Faces Tough Sledding In Senate, (by Robin Toner, The New York Times, May 25, 2001)
- Changed Circumstances in Senate Require Bush to Move Now on Missile Defense, (by Frank J.Gaffney, Jr. Center for Security Policy, May 24, 2001)
See also foreign press review on this subject at Strana.ru web site.
At a NATO meeting of foreign ministers in Budapest, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell failed to convince the allies that a threat of a missile attack against their countries actually exists. However, NATO does not consider the 1972 ABM Treaty as "the cornerstone of strategic stability" any more:
- Powell Fails to Persuade NATO on Antimissile Plan, (by Marc Lacey, The New York Times, May 30, 2001)
- NATO Divided on Missile Danger. Europeans Rebuff Powell's Plea to Recognize 'Common Threat', (by William Drozdiak, The Washington Post, Wednesday, May 30, 2001; Page A15)
- NATO drops its support of ABM pact, (by Ben Barber, The Washington Times, May 30, 2001)
Russian experts write on the prospects of Bush-Putin Summit in Slovenia:
- Bush-Putin Summit is Doomed to Success, - in Russian, (by Mikhail Gorbachev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 29, 2001)
- Aiming at Whole World, - in Russian, (by Sergey Ivanov, Sovetskaya Rossiya, May 26, 2001)
- US NMD Deployment will Bring New Arms Race, Kavshnin Says, - in Russian, (Kommersant, May 25, 2001)
- Will Putin Like Bush?, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Kosyrev, Dipcourier, May 24, 2001)
On Monday Russian MFA issued a press release In Relation to Adoption by European Parliament Session of a Resolution Concerning U.S. NMD Initiatives.
Latest public opinion polls in the US show tenuous support, and significant doubts, concerning NMD among the American public at large: Public Opinion Surveys: Support for NMD Declines as Americans Learn More, (Coalition Issue Brief, Coalition to Reduce Nuclear Dangers, May 21, 2001). See also:
- The Fuzzy Logic of President Bush's 'Strategic Framework', (Coalition Media Advisory, Coalition to Reduce Nuclear Dangers, May 25, 2001)
- The ABM Treaty: Critical Then and Now, (by John Rhinelander, Coalition Issue Brief, Coalition to Reduce Nuclear Dangers, May 24, 2001)
Russia's lower house of parliament rejected a resolution by a nationalist lawmaker that would have urged the president to suspend nuclear arms reductions in response to U.S. plans for a missile defense. The resolution would have asked Russian President Vladimir Putin to consider Russian withdrawal from the START II arms reduction treaty with the United States and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty: Duma rejects measure on arms controls, (by The Associated Press, Russia Journal, May 24, 2001)
One of the most important installations of the Russian ABM system does not exist for Moscow bureaucracy: Test Range Fights Bureaucracy Arbitrariness, - in Russian, (by Sergey Sokut, Nezavisimoye Voeyennoe Obozreniye, May 25, 2001).
May, 2001 issue of Arms Control Today includes:
- The First 100 Days, (by Spurgeon M. Keeny, Jr.)
- Europe and Missile Defense: Tactical Considerations, Fundamental Concerns, (by Andrew J. Pierre)
- U.S. and Russian/Soviet Strategic Nuclear Forces - START I MOU data as of January 2001.
On the Russian nuclear forces status see also: Russian Nuclear Forces, 2001, (The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, May-June 2001)
Selected articles published in recent issues of Disarmament Diplomacy:
- Conventionally-Armed UK Trident?, (by Robert Green, No. 56, April 2001)
- Multilateral Approaches to Preventing the Weaponisation of Space, (by Rebecca Johnson, No. 56, April 2001)
- Sandia Laboratory Director: White Paper on Nuclear Weapons, (No. 56, April 2001)
- Bush Administration Details Nuclear Weapons, Non-Proliferation Spending Plans, (No. 56, April 2001)
- Nagging Uncertainty and Growing Concern: The Bush Administration’s Arms Control Policy, (by Fan Jishe, No. 55, March 2001)
- Moving Beyond Missile Defence: The Search for Alternatives to the Missile Race, (by Jurgen Scheffran, No. 55, March 2001)
According to The Washington Post, proposals are circulating inside the U.S. defense establishment for radical changes in America's nuclear arsenal, including a phaseout of all land-based intercontinental missiles and a sharp reduction in the strategic bomber force: U.S. Nuclear Proposals Envision Sharp Cuts in Missiles, Bombers, (by Walter Pincus, The Washington Post, May 26, 2001). See also: Future use of the B-2 stealth bomber may not include nuclear weapons, (by Scott Canon, Kansas City Star, May 20, 2001)
Russian MFA denied assertions recently appeared in the American press that Russia is allegedly violating the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (Russian MFA Press Release, May 25, 2001)
Open Skies Treaty ratification precess completed: Federal Law of Russian Federation on Ratification of the Open Skies Treaty, - in Russian, (May 26, 2001). See also: Russian MFA Press Release Belarus Ratifies Open Skies Treaty (May 24, 2001)
Despite some strong opposition from the public at home and by the government in the United States, Russia is preparing to open its borders to become the largest international repository for radioactive nuclear wastes: Russia Sees Payoff in Storing Nuclear Waste From Around the World, (By Patrick E. Tyler, The New York Times, May 26, 2001)
Aleksandr Rumyantsev, Minister of Atomic Energy of Russian Federation, speaks on the problems and prospects of atomic energy: Not a Rookie Arrived, - in Russian, (by Nikolai Ivanov, Konstantin Mikhailov, Wek, N 20, May 25, 2001)
At the Russian START Forum: US intentions, and other topics.
May 24, 2001
U.S. President Bush and Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to hold their first meeting on June 16 in Slovenia to discuss missile defense and nuclear arms reduction issues:
- Will Bush Like Putin?, - in Russian, (by Dmitry Kosyrev, Dip Courier, May 24, 2001)
- Does BMD Make Moscow and Washington Closer?, - in Russian, (by Ksenia Fokina, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 22, 2001)
- Point a Finger at a Globe, - in Russian, (by Evgeni Bai, Izvestia, May 21, 2001)
- Ivanov Wins Early Putin-Bush Summit, (by Ron Popeski, The Moscow Times, May 21, 2001)
- Transcript of Remarks by Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Igor Ivanov at the Press Conference in Washington on the Results of His Visit to the United States of America, May 19, 2001
- Bush, Putin to Meet June 16. Missile Defense, Nuclear Arms Top Agenda for Slovenia Summit, (by Steven Mufson, The Washington Post, Saturday, May 19, 2001; Page A17)
- Bush, Putin Summit Set for Slovenia in Mid-June, (by Barry Schweid, Associated Press, Friday, May 18, 2001; 3:59 PM)
- Date for first Bush-Putin summit set, (by Geoffrey York, Globe and Mail, Saturday, May 19, 2001)
- Bush, Putin to Meet in Slovenia in June, (by Robin Wright, Los Angeles Times, May 19, 2001)
- Bush and Putin to hold talks on security, (by Edward Alden, Financial Times, May 19, 2001).
- Strategic Dialogue. Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov Negotiates in Washington, - in Russian, (by Vyacheslav Nikolayev, Wek, N 19, May 18-25, 2001).
- Putin and Bush to Meet on June 16th , (Gazeta.ru, May 18, 2001).
US team led by Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz visited Russia and several other European countries seeking at least acceptance of plan to build a missile defense system, but failed to win any. Alexander Yakovenko, a spokesman for the Russian Foreign Ministry, said the talks only underlined Russian concerns. "The American side has so far failed to produce convincing arguments that would persuade us that it has a clear vision of how to handle international security issues without disrupting the arms control arrangements that have been established over the past 30 years," Yakovenko said.
- Mutual Understanding at Ground Zero, - in Russian, (by Vladimir Mukhin and Pyotr Chernyakov, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 12, 2001).
- U.S., Russia Meet Over Missile Shield, (By Jim Heintz, The Moscow Times, May 14, 2001)
- Americans Failed to Conquer Russia, - in Russian, (by Andrei Ivanov, Kommersant, May 12, 2001).
- Bush Seeks Backing for Missile Plan, (By Peter Baker, The Washington Post, May 12, 2001)
- Russia Still Not Swayed by Missile Shield Plan, (By Robyn Dixon, Los Angeles Times, May 12, 2001)
- Europe Unsure. Russia Rock Solid?, - in Russian, (by Vladimir Skosyrev, Vremya MN, May 11, 2001)
- Strategic Dialogue Resumed, - in Russian, (Von Lothar Ruehl, Neue Zuericher Zeitung, May 11, 2001), original in German is here.
- Russia wary of US missile plan, (BBC News, May 11, 2001).
The discussion on should Russia tie its position on the 1972 ABM Treaty up to strategic arms reductions is still open. See Russia Is Interested In A Dialog, Not In Mere Words, - in Russian, by Pavel Podvig (May 17, 2001), and The Point Is Not Desirability But Possibility of a Dialogue, - in Russian, by Nikolai Sokov (May 22, 2001) . See also:
- Calculations and Miscalculations. Russian Policy towards Missile Defenses Has to be Revised, - in Russian, (by Pavel Podvig, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, May 11, 2001)
- US-Russian Consultations: Underlying Motives For the Dialogue, (by Ivan Safranchuk, PIR-Center Arms Control Letters, Letter of May, May 22, 2001)
- Missile Defenses: Pro and Cons, - in Russian, (by Igor Andreyev, Utro.ru, May 21, 2001)
- We Still Need Arms Control, (By Pavel Felgenhauer, The Moscow Times, May 17, 2001)
- What U.S. are Afraid of Or an Umbrella for Fish, - in Russian, (by Pavel Zimin, Utro.ru, May 16, 2001)
- NMD: To Be Or Not To Be? - in Russian, (by Vasili Safronchuk, Sovetskaya Rossiya, May 15, 2001)
- Washington-Moscow: a New Start, - in Russian, (by Victor Kuvaldin, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 12, 2001)
- Testing the Strength of the Idea. Will Missile Defenses for Europe be Capable to Ensure Strategic Stability?, - in Russian, (by Alexandr Menshikov, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, May 11, 2001)
"...Brezhnev and Nixon solemnly signed ABM and SALT Treaties on May 26 1972 at 11 am. Cameras chattered, people drank champaign, but both leaders did not know as well as majority of people in the hall, that in fact different documents were signed...": ABM Treaty Was Agreed in Tundra, - in Russian, (by Oleg Grinevski, Dip Courier, May 24, 2001)
Democratic members of Congress have been honing a response to President Bush's call for a global shield against ballistic missiles. Their strategy is not to attack the idea of missile defense, but to question whether the technology works and whether the diplomatic and financial trade-offs are worthwhile:
- Democrats Plot Strategy on Missile Defense, (by Steven Mufson, The Washington Post, Sunday, May 20, 2001; Page A14)
- 25 Years Later, Rumsfeld's Dream Is Alive Again, (by James Dao and Eric Schmitt, (The New York Times, May 18, 2001)
- Ballistic Missile Defense in the Bush Defense Review: Problems and Prospects, (William Hartung, World Policy Institute, May 5, 2001)
China stands firm in its opposition to the Bush administration plan for national missile defenses:
- U.S. Envoy Stymied at Missile Talks in China, (by Erik Eckholm, The New York Times, May 16, 2001)
- China Firm On Missile Defense Opposition. U.S. Envoy Pushes Plan in Beijing, (by Philip P. Pan, The Washington Post, Wednesday, May 16, 2001; Page A19)
See also: Russian MFA Press Release Russia, China Hold Consultations on Disarmament Issues (May 22, 2001)
President of Kazakhstan condemned US policy towards missile defenses: Kazakhs Take Strong Issue With Bush's Missile Project, (by Judith Miller, The New York Times, May 21, 2001)
Poland is the first East European country to openly support US plans to deploy missile defenses: Poland Wants to Defend America, - in Russian, (by Vladimir Vodo, Kommersant, May 18, 2001)
India supports US NMD deployment plans as well:
- New Aspects in Indian Policy, - in Russian, (by Alexandr Shilin, Krasnaya Zvezda, May 22, 2001)
- Missile Defense Plan Is Uniting U.S., India Americans Hint at Possibly Lifting Sanctions, (by Pamela Constable, The Washington Post, Sunday, May 20, 2001; Page A21)
- New Delhi: Searching for an Alliance of Interests with Washington, (Carnegie Endowment for Peace, May 15, 2001)
1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty inspection regime ends May 31:
- Tchaikovski Chords Under Saryozek, - in Russian, (by Anatoli Dokuchayev, Wek, N 19, May 18-25, 2001)
- Fact Sheet: State Department on 1987 INF Missile Treaty, May 16, 2001)
More media comments on the fire in satellite control center of the Russian military:
- Guard Fell Asleep. On Orbit, - in Russian, (by Oleg Vladykin, Obschaya Gazeta, May 17, 2001)
- Satellites Back Online, (By The Associated Press, The Moscow Times, May 15, 2001)
- Full control over satellites restored, (By The Associated Press, Russia Journal, May 15, 2001)
- What Happened to the President's Nuclear Case? It Burned Out, - in Russian, (by Roman Shleynov, Novaya Gazeta, May 14, 2001)
- Space-Scale Fire in Kaluga, - in Russian, (by Vladimir Urban, Novyye Izvestia, May 11, 2001)
Commander of the Russian Long-Range Aviation Lt. Gen. Mikhail Oparin speaks on problems and prospects of Long-Range Aviation: In Conventional and Nuclear War, - in Russian, (by Igor Korotchenko, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, May 18, 2001)
Administration for Rocket and Space Weapons of the Russian Strategic Rocket Forces turned 55. See interview with Lt. Gen. Valery Subbotin, the Head of the Administration: From R-1 to Topol, - in Russian, (by Alexandr Bogatyrev, Krasnaya Zvezda, May 17, 2001)
American experts believe that Bush administration's decision to cut funding of DOE programs aimed to improve Russian nuclear arsenal safeguards is a mistake:
- "A Dangerous Step Backwards" Why Has President Bush Cut Funding To Combat Nuclear Proliferation In Russia, And Will Congress Be Able To Bring It Back? (By Fiona Morgan, Salon.com, May 16, 2001)
- DOE's Efforts to Secure Nuclear Material and Employ Weapons Scientists in Russia, (by Ms. Gary Jones, director, natural resources and environment, statement before the Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities, Senate Committee on Armed Services, GAO-01-726T, May 15, 2001) - a PDF file
May 18, 2001 the PIR Center held a meeting on "The Problems of Implementation of the US-Russian Plutonium Disposition and Management Agreement". Keynote speaker was Ms. Laura Holgate, vice-president of Nuclear Threat Initiative Fund, who used to work in the US administration and took active part in negotiating the agreement. She spoke on the NTI plans and shared her views on the problems of implementation of the agreement.
Decisions of the Moscow Nuclear Safety and Security Summit are still topical: Nuclear World Outline, - in Russian, (by Victor Mikhailov, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 19, 2001)
Minister of Atomic Energy of Russia Alexandr Rumyantsev believes that his department has to become more open: Nuclear Technologies -- Russia's Hope, - in Russian, (by Andrei Vaganov, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 11, 2001). See also: Nuclear Complex Indivisible, - in Russian, (by Nikolai Ivanov, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 15, 2001)
Minatom's Head of Department for Development and Testing of Nuclear Weapons Nikolai Voloshin denies reports on nuclear tests on Novaya Zemlya:: Minatom Has Nothing to Hide, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Safronov, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, May 11, 2001)
A project for long term storage of radioactive wastes has been presented by the Russian Minatom for consideration. The first home burial site is supposed to be located at Novaya Zemlya, three hundred kilometers from the inactive nuclear weapons test site. However, some experts are certain: the first federal burial site at Novaya Zemlya is capable in fact to create more problems than it can solve: Where To Bury the Native Atom?, - in Russian, (by Yelena Ovchinnikova, Expert, May 21, 2001)
The Bush administration has postponed a major part of the Energy Department's plan to dispose of plutonium left over from nuclear weapons production:
- Change in Plutonium Disposal Plan Draws Complaints, (by Matthew L. Wald, The New York Times, May 20, 2001)
- Nuclear Energy Industry Reclaims Spotlight, (The New York Times, May 20, 2001)
PIR Center published a handbook on arms control, the first publication in Russia to summarize fundamental arms control treaties between USSR (Russia) and USA.
On the history of Soviet space weapons see: Race on Space Theater, - in Russian, (by Anatoli Dokuchayev, NVO NG, May 18, 2001)
President Dwight D. Eisenhower's top secret instructions that delegated nuclear-launch authority to military commanders and the Secretary of Defense under specific emergency conditions, declassified for the first time last month, appeared on the World Wide Web site of the National Security Archive: First Declassification Of Eisenhower's Instructions Predelegating Nuclear Weapons Use, (The National Security Archive, May 18, 2001)
At the Russian START Forum: US NMD deployment, and other topics.
May 11, 2001
A devastating fire raced through a satellite control center of the Russian military 120 miles southwest of Moscow. "As a result of the fire, we do not have constant contact with four satellites," Anatoly Perminov, commander of the Space Forces, said. However, "...the loss of early-warning capability would not have any serious impact on Russia's (or any other country's) security...," Pavel Podvig, an expert with our Center, pointed out: Our Comment: The fire may be serious, but there is no reason for concern, (May 10, 2001):
- Fire in Russia Space Center, (by The New York Times, May 11, 2001)
- Army Loses Control Of Satellites in Fire, (by Jon Boyle, The New York Times, May 11, 2001)
- Russia Has Problems with Ballistic Missile Defense, - in Russian, (Kommersant, May 11, 2001)
- A Space Fire, - in Russian, (by Yuri Granovskii, Vedomosti, May 11, 2001)
- Russian Satellites Watch the United States Again, - in Russian, (by Sergei Ivashko and Sergei Syrov, Gazeta.Ru, May 10, 2001)
See also: Reducing a Common Danger: Improving Russia's Early-Warning System, (by Geoffrey Forden, Cato Policy Analysis, No. 399 May 3, 2001) and our special section: Current Status of Russian Early Warning System
A speech by President Bush on May 1, 2001 at the National Defense University in Washington that confirmed US course to deploy NMD and announced plans to proceed with unilateral reductions of nuclear weapons, still draws media comments. Does it imply Washington's intention to abort US-Russian dialogue or, on the contrary, is in fact a prelude to new, non-confrontational relations between the two countries? Experts opinions vary. For the START Web Site exclusively:
- Exclusive: On a Speech by President Bush at the National Defense University, - in Russian, (by Pavel Podvig, May 5, 2001)
- Opinion: Talking About the Dialogue, - in Russian, (by Nikolai Sokov, May 9, 2001)
See also:
- Germany's Question: Could U.S. Missile System Be Cooperative? (By Roger Cohen, The New York Times, May 11, 2001)
- Behind the Shield, A 3-Sided Rivalry, (by Patrick Tyler, The New York Times, May 6, 2001)
- No BMD Dialogue to Expect, - in Russian, (by Pavel Podvig, SMI.ru, May 5, 2001)
- George W. Bush Changed the Tone, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev, Vladimir Dunayev, Evgeny Grigoriev and Yelena Shesternina, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 4, 2001)
- Resolute Bush and Modest Europe, - in Russian, (by Yuri Yershov, Rossijskaya Gazeta, May 4, 2001)
- Don't Allow the Return of Cold War, - in Russian, (by Alexei Lyaschenko, Krasnaya Zvezda, May 4, 2001)
- The Devil is in the Details. Bush's BMD Plan Provoked Conflicting, - in Russian, (by Yevgeny Bai, Dmitri Safonov, Izvestia, May 4, 2001)
- Taking a Look at the Workings of a Missile Shield, (by Steven Lee Myers and James Glanz, The New York Times, May 3, 2001)
- Friendly Dissuasion, (by William Safire, The New York Times, May 3, 2001)
- Missile Defense Talk Outstrips Technology, (by Steven Mufson and Walter Pincus, The Washington Post, Thursday, May 3, 2001; Page A16)
- Russians reassured by promise of talks on 'Star Wars', (by Patrick Cockburn and Mary Dejevsky, Independent, May 3, 2001)
- Russia and Europe ready to hear Bush plan, (by Richard Norton-Taylor and Martin Kettle, Guardian, Thursday, May 3, 2001)
- Military Analysis: Grand Plan, Few Details, (by Michael R. Gordon, The New York Times, May 2, 2001)
- In Strategy Overhaul, Bush Seeks a Missile Shield, (by David E. Sanger and Steven lee Myers, The New York Times, May 2, 2001)
- Russian Academy of Military Sciences Does Not Consider the Rejection of the 1972 ABM Treaty Principles Possible, - in Russian, (Strana.ru, May 2, 2001)
- Bush's Precedent, - in Russian, (by Yevgeni Sokolov, Vesti.ru, May 2, 2001)
- George W. Bush Proposes to Abandon the 1972 ABM Treaty, - in Russian, (Strana.ru, May 2, 2001)
- Excerpt from a speech by President Bush at the National Defense University in Washington, May 1, 2001
- Nuclear Experts Say Bush Missile Plan Will Decrease Overall Security: Urge Action on Missile Defense Reductions and Nuclear 'Stand-Down, (Coalition to Reduce Nuclear Dangers, Press Release, May 1, 2001)
- Unilateral Withdrawal From The ABM Treaty Is A Bad Idea, (by Ivo H. Daalder and James M. Lindsay, International Herald Tribune, April 30, 2001)
Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs Igor Ivanov gave rather mild comment on George W. Bush's speach, declared readiness for a dialogue. American delegation is led by Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defence secretary. Characteristically, on the day before the US officially refused to continue cooperation under the framework of the Standing Consultative Commission (SCC) -- a bilateral commission created in accordance with Article XIII of the 1972 ABM Treaty. US notified Moscow that they will not attend the scheduled SCC session, and did not set the date for the next session.
- "We Have Something to Say on the Matter", - in Russian, (by Dmitri Safronov, Izvestiya, May 11, 2001)
- The Pentagon Will Carry the "Most Complex Negotiations", - in Russian, (by Yelena Shesternina, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, May 11, 2001)
- Putin gives cautious welcome to US pledge to consult on missile defence, (by Patrick Cockburn, Independent, May 5, 2001)
- The Game of ABM Give-Away, - in Russian, (by Vyacheslav Tetetkin, Sovetskaya Rossiya, May 4, 2001)
- Global Reaction to Missile Plan Is Cautious, (by Patrick E. Tyler, The New York Times, May 3, 2001)
- Russia Alters Tone, Welcomes Talks on Missile Shield, (by Peter Baker and William Drozdiak, The Washington Post, Thursday, May 3, 2001; Page A16)
- Transcript of Minister of Foreign Affairs Igor Ivanov's Remarks at Press Conference, Russian MFA, May 2, 2001
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said yesterday the administration has no clear plan for how to build the global missile defense because experimentation on various options has been banned under the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. He also announced an administrative reorganization of Pentagon space programs giving them a higher profile:
- Plan for Missile Defense Not Clear, (by Roberto Suro, The Washington Post, Wednesday, May 9, 2001)
- Rumsfeld Plan Skirts Call for Stationing Arms in Space, (by James Dao, The New York Times, May 9, 2001)
- Lost in Space: The Misguided Drive Toward Antisatellite Weapons, (by Michael Krepon, Foreign Affairs, May/June, 2001)
The Senate confirmed John R. Bolton on Tuesday as the nation's chief arms-control official after hearing a wholehearted endorsement from Sen. Jesse Helms. Mr. Bolton's appointment is another sign of the US's hard line on positions and a unilateralist policy: abandon the existing system of international treaties:
- Military Analysis: U.S. Weighing Future of Arms Pacts, (by Michael R. Gordon, The New York Times, May 9, 2001)
- Senate Confirms Bolton as Top Arms Control Official, (by The Associated Press, May 8, 2001)
- The Bush Doctrine, (by Charles Krauthammer, The Washington Post, Wednesday, May 4, 2001)
- Senate Democrats Square Off With Bush Over Missile Plan, (by Alison Mitchell, The New York Times, May 3, 2001)
Ukraine, has offered to help Washington turn NMD into a reality: NMD's New Supporter, (by Doug Bandow, The Washington Times, May 8, 2001).
It was striking this week when India effusively praised elements of President Bush's missile-defense plan and said nary a critical word: Rare Praise From India on U.S. Defense, (by Celia W. Dugger, The New York Times, May 6, 2001)
US Air Force plans to start development of a new ICBM in 2004-2005: New USAF ICBM Emerges, Cruise Missile Flounders (by Robert Wall, Aviation Week and Space Technology, April 23, 2001)
On the prospective structure of the US strategic nuclear forces see also: The Coming Threat, (by Capt. William L. Norris, The Submarine Review, April, 2001)
The New York Times published an article about Rose Gottemoeller, former deputy administrator for defense nuclear nonproliferation in the U.S. Department of Energy, currently a Senior Associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. She is well-known as an active supporter of the US-Russian dialogue, and she is widely respected by both Democrats and Republicans: Public Lives: When She Talks Arms, Washington and Moscow Listen, (by Philip Shenon, The New York Times, May 7, 2001)
According to Bloomberg.com, The Federal Bureau of Investigation cleared TRW Inc. of Prof. Theodore Postol and Dr. Nira Schwartz's allegations it manipulated the test results in a program for the U.S. missile defense system: FBI Clears TRW Inc. Of Fraud Charge In Missile Defense Test, (by Tony Capaccio, Bloomberg.com, May 4, 2001)
Recent issues of Yadernoe Nerasprostraneniye (No 37, October-November 2000) runs (all in Russian,):
- Global System of Missiles and Missile Technology Control - Origins and Prospects (by Alexandr Klapovsky)
- UN and Nuclear Disarmament, (by Yuri Belobrov)
- The Problems of Tactical Nuclear Weapons Control, (by Vladimir Belous)
- Military Spendings in the 2001 Federal Budget, (by Pyotr Romashkin)
The discussion around a set of controversial bills allowing the import and storage of spent nuclear fuel continues:
- Pocket Wastes. Russians Ministers Come and Go while Spent Nuclear Fuel Stays Here, - in Russian, (by Roman Shleynov, Novaya Gazeta, May 7, 2001)
- Nuclear Delusion, or Why Spent Nuclear Fuel Should Not be Imported to Russia, - in Russian. (Bulletin of "Yadernaya i Radiatsionnaya Bezopasnost" Program, No 1-2, 2001)
USEC Inc., the US company that purchases nuclear fuel reprocessed from Russian missiles, plans to lower the price it pays Russia for the converted warhead material. USEC President William H. Timbers claims that the new pricing plan has been endorsed by USEC's Russian counterpart, and is also supported by senior Russian officials: Nuclear Fuel Firm Fights for Russia Deal, (by Peter Behr, The Washington Post, Monday, May 7, 2001; Page E01). See also: Future Prospects for the HEU Deal, (Carnegie Endowment for Peace, May 3, 2001)
At the Russian START Forum: US NMD deployment, and other topics.
What Was New?
In 2001: January | February | March | April
In 2000: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 1999: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 1998: January | February | March | April | May | June | July-September | October | November | December
In 1997: November | December
Search the START Web Site
© Center for Arms Control, Energy and Environmental Studies at MIPT, 1999-2001