What was new on STAR Site?
June, 2002
June 26, 2002
The preparatory process for ratification of the Treaty on Strategic Offensive Reductions, signed on May 24, 2002, by the Presidents of Russia and the USA, has been launched both in Russia and the U.S. Last week, the text of the Treaty and article-by-article commentaries thereto were sent to the related committees of the State Duma and Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, and U.S. President George W. Bush submitted the Treaty to the Senate for its advice and consent prior to ratification:
- U.S.-Russia: Bush Submits Moscow Treaty to Senate , (by Mike Nartker, Global Security Newswire, Friday, June 21, 2002)
- Russian MFA Press Release On Preparations for Ratification of the Treaty on Strategic Offensive Reductions, June 21, 2002.
- Bush Sends Senate US-Russia Treaty, (by The Associated Press, Thursday, June 20, 2002; 6:59 PM)
- President George Bush Message to the Senate of the United States, June 20, 2002
- Fact Sheet: U.S.-Russia Nuclear Reduction Treaty Comparison, (BASIC Press Release, June 2002)
- Summary and Accomplishments of the Bush-Putin Presidential Summit, (by Ingrid Staudenmeyer, RANSAC, May 2002)
See also our special section on Status of U.S.-Russian Negotiations on Strategic Arms Reduction
The new STAR Site exclusive publication is Pyotr Romashkin's commentary State Duma on the New Treaty between Russia and USA, - in Russian, (June 21, 2002).
US withdrawal from the 1972 ABM Treaty remains in the spotlight. Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye notes: "...We have to admit, that Moscow was shutout in this match. Today, Washington is not bound by any international legal limitations on the development of missile defenses. The signed in May Treaty on Strategic Offensive Reductions (SORT) does not contain anything that could be interpreted as acknowledgement of a link between offensive and defensive weapons. Western press interprets the treaty as a ritual gesture that George W. Bush made on request from Kremlin, which was eager to save the irretrievably lost status of a power equal to the US. Prospects of any following discussions of nuclear weapons issues are very vague, and there are no incentives left to continue the negotiations...": Washington's Win over Moscow, - in Russian, (by Sergey Sokut, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, June 21, 2002) See also:
- U.S.-Russia Defense Cooperation Seen, (by George Gedda, Associated Press, Thursday, June 20, 2002; 4:45 PM)
- ABM Treaty: Pact’s End Is Essential to Effective Strategy, Crouch Says, (Global Security Newswire , June 20, 2002)
- The end of a treaty and an era, (by J.D. Crouch, The Washington Times, June 19, 2002)
- Washington Back to the Brink With ABM Treaty Demise, (BASIC Press Release, June 12, 2002)
See our special section on How Should Russia Respond to the Impending US NMD Deployment?
The United States will perfect a missile defense system now that it is free from the ABM treaty, the director of the Missile Defense Agency Lt. Gen. Ronald Kadish said. According to official reports, the Agency wants to have a sea-based missile defense system deployed by 2004. However, critics believe that this plan is unrealistic.
- U.S. Plans: Pentagon Considers Incremental Acquisitions, ( Global Security Newswire , Tuesday, June 25, 2002)
- Successful missile defense system predicted, (by Sean Salai, The Washington Times, June 21, 2002)
- ABM Treaty Withdrawal Prompts New Look At Programs, Kadish Says, (by Nick Jonson, Aerospace Daily, June 20, 2002)
- U.S. Plans: Sea-Based System Sought by 2004, MDA Director Says , (Global Security Newswire , Wednesday, June 19, 2002)
- U.S. Plans: Army Plans More Flight Tests for PAC 3 Missile, (Global Security Newswire , June 18, 2002)
- Pentagon Could Begin Deployment Of Some Missile Defenses By 2004, (by Greg Jaffe, Wall Street Journal, June 18, 2002)
According to Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Russian President upheld Defense Ministry's proposal to increase defense budget. Moreover, while currently allocation on development of strategic nuclear forces constitutes 18% of the budget, by 2003 this number will grow to 23-25%. The article also says that they succeeded in convincing Vladimir Putin that development and maintenance of Strategic Rocket Forces will be more affordable for the country, than those of the sea-based leg of the triad:
- Military - Government: 1-0 in Favor of Missiles, - in Russian, (by Vladimir Georgiyev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 21, 2002)
- US missile defence plans give Russia nuclear "flexibility": minister, (by Agence France Presse, June 19, 2002)
Wednesday, Northern fleet was to receive a Typhoon-class SSBN on a ceremony. The submarine was under repair and modernization for 12 years. Experts discuss advisability of priority-driven development of sea-based strategic forces:
- Submarine Will Be Shown To Ministers, - in Russian, (by Sergei Sokut, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 26, 2002)
- Russian Navy to Receive "Akula" Today, - in Russian, (Novosti RBC, June 25, 2002)
- Recurrence of Global Ambitions, - in Russian, (by Sergey Brezkun, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, June 21, 2002)
Krasnaya Zvezda published an article on a Special Purpose Missile and Space Defense Army: Special Purpose Army, - in Russian, (by Gennady Miranovich, Alexandr Bogatyrev, Alexandr Dolinin, Krasnaya Zvezda, June 21, 2002)
The Pentagon proposed US President to merge United States Space Command with the United States Strategic Command: New Command Would Meld Missile Defense and Offense , (by Eric Schmitt, The New York Times, June 24, 2002)
US administration proposed for a $15.5 million study to determine whether two existing warheads - the B83 and B61 thermonuclear gravity bombs - could be turned into nuclear bunker-busters:
- New nuclear arms for new targets? (by Jonathan S. Landay, Philadelphia Inquirer, Friday, June 21, 2002)
- ABM, Mini-Nukes, and Hillary, - in Russian, (by Marina Kalashnikova, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 19, 2002)
Monday, Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an interview with Russian Minister of Atomic Energy: Alexandr Rumyantsev: Even if the Sun Stops to Shine, - in Russian, (by Alexandr Yemelyanenkov, Vladimir Sluzhakov, Natalia Yachmennikova, Rossijskaya Gazeta, June 25, 2002).
Last week, having received official approval by the governments of Russian Federation and USA, an agreement to use market-based mechanism to price U.S. purchases of uranium taken from dismantled Russian nuclear weapons entered into force:
- Official statement of the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy on the Highly-Enriched Uranium Agreement, June 21, 2002
- U.S.-Russia: HEU Parties Agree to Float Pricing, (Global Security Newswire, Wednesday, June 20, 2002)
- United States and Russia agree on New Contract Terms for the Highly-Enriched Uranium Agreement, (US State Department, June 19, 2002)
- Uranium Enrichment: U.S. Energy Department, USEC Sign Agreement, (by Mike Nartker, Global Security Newswire, Wednesday, June 19, 2002)
- High-Tech Uranium Plant to Be Built , (by Nancy Zuckerbrod, The Washington Post, Tuesday, June 18, 2002; 5:39 PM)
- DOE Inks Agreement To Ensure Domestic Uranium Enrichment Capacity Is Maintained, (DOE Official Statement, June 18, 2002)
- USEC and U.S. Energy Department Sign Accord, (USEC Press Release, June 18, 2002)
The US expects to spend $20 million this year to safeguard dangerous radiological materials in the former Soviet Union: U.S. and Russia to Guard 'Dirty Bomb' Materials, (by Peter Slevin, The Washington Post, Tuesday, June 25, 2002; Page A15). See also:
- Foul-Ups Mar Effort On Nuclear Materials, (by Guy Gugliotta, The Washington Post , Wednesday, June 26, 2002; Page A16)
- Agency Says 'Dirty Bomb' Could Be Made in Any Country , (by Serge Schmemann, The New York Times , June 25, 2002)
- Radiological Weapons: IAEA to Secure Former Soviet "Dirty Bomb" Materials, (by Bryan Bender, Global Security Newswire , Tuesday, June 25, 2002)
- Inadequate Control of World's Radioactive Sources, (IAEA Press Release, Tuesday, 25 June 2002, 15:00 CET)
- "Dirty Bomb" Can Be Blown Up in Russia, - in Russian, (by Andrei Lubenski, Pravda.Ru, June 21, 2002) - an interview with Lidiya Popova, Director of the Social-Ecology Union's Center for Nuclear Ecology and Energy Policy
- Dirty Bomb Threat Is Real, (by Pavel Felgenhauer, The Moscow Times, June 20, 2002)
- Russia's Scattered Tactical Arms A Temptation For Terrorists, (by David Filipov, Boston Globe, June 18, 2002)
Experts with Bellona believe that conversion of reactors that continue to churn out weapons grade plutonium, have come no closer over the past decade to reaching fruition: New US Budget Dumps Conversion of Russian Plutonium Reactors, (by Charles Digges, Igor Kudrik, Bellona, June 12, 2002)
According to Valery Lebedev, Russia's Deputy Minister of Atomic Energy, Russia will build an estimated $70 million dumpsite on an Arctic archipelago to store spent nuclear fuel. He said that it could take from five to seven years to build the first part, expected to hold 5,500 tons of waste and cost about $15 million.
- Novaya Zemlya As An Object Of Commerce, - in Russian, (by Vladimir Georgiyev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 26, 2002)
- Nuclear Wastes will be Buried on Novaya Zemlya, - in Russian, (by Alexandr Smirnov, Gazeta.ru, June 24, 2002)
- "Nuclear" Loss for the Treasury, - in Russian, (by Yelena Subbotina, Vremya MN, June 22, 2002)
- Russia Plans Dumpsite on Archipelago, (by Vladimir Isachenkov, Associated Press, Friday, June 21, 2002; 2:03 PM)
Greenpeace of Russia accused Minatom in breaking the law: "Russia has failed to secure guarantees from Iran that Tehran will return spent nuclear, but Minatom continues building a nuclear power plant in Iran"
- Iran will Share Nuclear Wastes with Russia, - in Russian, (by Irina Rybalchenko, Kommersant, June 25, 2002)
- Russia fails to secure Tehran nuclear deal, (by Ian Traynor, The Guardian, June 25, 2002)
- Russia's nuclear ministry rejects allegations that Iran may be hiding nuclear materials from Russian-built reactor, (by Vladimir Isachenkov, Associated Press, Friday, Jun 21, 6:53 AM ET)
- Russian nuclear know-how pours into Iran, (by Scott Peterson, Christian Science Monitor, June 21, 2002)
- Greenpeace of Russia Press Release, June 21, 2002 (in Russian)
- An analysis of organization and effectiveness of the work on implementation of international agreements of Russian Federation on import, storage and processing of spent nuclear fuel from foreign nuclear reactors, - in Russian, (Ministry of Atomic Energy of Russian Federation, 2002)
- Problems of Handling Nuclear Wastes in Russia, - in Russian, (Ministry of Atomic Energy of Russian Federation, June 21, 2002)
A U.S. federal judge banned South Carolina Governor Jim Hodges from blocking plutonium shipments to the U.S. Energy Department’s Savannah River site from the Rocky Flats former nuclear weapons plant in Colorado:
- Just How Secure Is a Nuclear Waste Truck? , (by Jim Hall, The Moscow Times , Thursday, Jun. 20, 2002)
- A Nuclear.Ru Report, June 19, 2002 (in Russian)
- United States: Judge Orders South Carolina to Allow Shipments , (Global Security Newswire, Wednesday, June 19, 2002)
- S.C. Governor Loses Fight Against Plutonium, (by Manuel Roig-Franzia and Eric Pianin, The Washington Post , Wednesday, June 19, 2002; Page A03 )
- United States: Court to Consider Ending South Carolina Blockade, ( Global Security Newswire, June 18, 2002)
June 18, 2002
The 1972 ABM Treaty that restricted development of anti-ballistic missile systems ceased to be in force last week. Politicians and experts are divided on the event and assess feasible consequences differently, but it is quite clear that the arms control system that was created during the Cold War and that played a tremendous role in restraining arms race and preventing a nuclear conflict between superpowers, is being retired. However, remaining in the agenda is the central question -- what are current threats, and will effective and adequate mechanisms to rebut them be created?
- No ABM Treaty, No Missile Defense, (by Joseph Cirincione, Carnegie Endowment For Peace, Monday, June 17, 2002)
- Beyond the ABM Treaty, (by Paul Wolfowitz, The Wall Street Journal, Friday, June 14, 2002)
- U.S. Plans I: Pentagon Free to Pursue Multiple Technologies, Expert Says, (by David Ruppe, Global Security Newswire, June 14, 2002)
- Statement by the President Bush on Expiration of the ABM Treaty, White House, Office of the Press Secretary, June 13, 2002
- Vladimir Dvorkin: "US NMD Not a Threat for Russia", - in Russian, (Strana.ru, June 13, 2002)
- US Withdraws from the ABM Treaty on June 13, - in Russian, (by Olga Romanova, Vesti.ru, June 13, 2002)
- ABM Treaty: Cheers and Jeers as Historic Pact Expires Today, (Global Security Newswire , Wednesday, June 13, 2002 )
- Arms Control Experts Fault U.S. Withdrawal From ABM Treaty: Effective Missile Defense Deployment Still Years Away, (Arms Control Association, June 12, 2002)
See our special section on How Should Russia Respond to the Impending US NMD Deployment?, and media comments:
- Pentagon's Ambitious Plans, - in Russian, (by Alexei Lyaschenko, Krasnaya Zvezda, June 18, 2002)
- An American Dream, - in Russian, (by Yuri Golotyuk, Vremya Novostey, June 17, 2002)
- Funeral of the ABM Treaty, - in Russian, (by Pavel Felgenhauer, Politcom.Ru, June 16, 2002)
- ABM Treaty Ceased To Be In Force, - in Russian, (by Yevgeni Grigoryev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 14, 2002)
- Retired Treaty, - in Russian, (by Artur Blinov and Yuri Zhigalkin, Vremya MN, June 14, 2002)
- US Took Off ABM, - in Russian, (by Ksenia Solyanskaya, Gazeta.ru, June 14, 2002)
- U.S. Withdraws From Missile Treaty, (by Dana Milbank, The Washington Post, Friday, June 14, 2002; Page A28)
- With a Shrug, a Monument to Cold War Fades Away , (By David E. Sanger with Michael Wines, The New York Times, June 14, 2002)
- Bush Hails End of ABM Treaty, (by Ron Fournier, Associated Press, Friday, June 14, 2002; 7:42 AM)
- NMD in a "Potyomkin Village"? , - in Russian, (by Alexei Grinyov, SMI.Ru, June 13, 2002)
- US Cannot Stand it Any Longer, - in Russian, (by Olga Koleva, Vesti.ru, June 13, 2002)
- United States: No ABM Treaty Already, No NMD Yet, - in Russian, (Utro.Ru, June 13, 2002)
- The death of the ABM treaty, (The Washington Times, June 12, 2002)
Russian MFA released an official statement that Russian Federation disavows its obligations under START II Treaty
- START II Is Dead, - in Russian, (by Ivan Safronov, Kommersant, June 15, 2002)
- Russia Quits Arms Pact, (by Sharon LaFraniere, The Washington Post, Saturday, June 15, 2002; Page A20)
- After U.S. Scraps ABM Treaty, Russia Rejects Curbs of Start II, (by Michael Wines, The New York Times , June 15, 2002)
- Russia Withdraws From Nuke Treaty, (by Vladimir Isachenkov, Associated Press, Friday, June 14, 2002; 2:15 PM)
- Russia abandons Start II arms treaty, (BBC, June 14, 2002)
- Russia tears up START II treaty, (Agence France Press, June 14, 2002)
- Russian MFA official statement on Legal Status of the Treaty Between Russia and the USA on Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms, June 14, 2002
June 14 Russian State Duma released a statement "On New Agreements between Russia and the USA on Strategic Stability". The statement notes that the May 24 signature of the Russian-American Treaty on Strategic Offensive Reductions and Joint Declaration on the New Strategic Relationship between the two countries "allows to limit the damage to strategic stability and Russian national security caused by the US unilateral withdrawal from the 1972 ABM Treaty"
- State Duma Released a Statement on Strategic Stability, - in Russian, (Kommersant, June 15, 2002)
- US Withdrawal from the ABM Treaty is a Big Political Mistake, - in Russian, (Pravda.ru, June 14, 2002)
"...The "Treaty of Moscow," the much-heralded agreement to reduce strategic nuclear weapons, was signed, but loose ends are still hanging. In particular, the transparency measures that are needed to assure that nuclear warheads are no longer a threat must still be developed..." (From Summits to Sleepovers, by Rose Gottemoeller, The Moscow Times, Monday, June 17, 2002).
Severodvinsk shipyard Sevmash has started defueling a Typhoon class submarine. The submarine will be scrapped shortly after that. The whole process is funded by the US Cooperative Threat Reduction program, or Nunn-Lugar program: Russia scraps Typhoons, (by Igor Kudrik, Bellona, June 12, 2002)
Thursday, June 13, a Navy ship in the Pacific shot down a dummy warhead using an interceptor rocket guided by on-board radar, in the first test of the sea-based component of a missile defense system. According to preliminary information, conditions of the test were similar to those of the 25 January 2002 Aegis-LEAP Interceptor Test. A Pentagon official stated that the test was a success.
- US downs missile in space, (BBC News, Friday, 14 June, 2002, 05:02 GMT 06:02 UK)
- Navy Reports Success in Missile Defense Test, (The New York Times , June 13, 2002)
- Sea-Based Midcourse Defense Flight Test Successful, MDA Official Press Release, June 13, 2002
- An Analysis of the 25 January 2002 Test of the Aegis-LEAP Interceptor for Navy Theater-Wide, (by David Wright, Union of Concerned Scientists, March 3, 2002)
Saturday, June 15 the United States has started work on the construction of a test site at Fort Greely in central Alaska, that is planned to be completed by Fall 2004.
- Laying of Foundation Of Missile Defense, - in Russian, (by Yevgeni Bay, Izvestia, June 18, 2002)
- US begins missile defence work, (BBC News, Sunday, 16 June, 2002, 06:42 GMT 07:42 UK)
- Bush Missile-Defense Plans Go Forward, (by Andrea Stone, USA Today, June 13, 2002, Pg. 6)
Philip Coyle, formerly the assistant secretary of defense and director of Operational Test and Evaluation (1994-2001), seriously criticised the program of testing of the Ground-based midcourse element of the planned Missile Defense System: Prepared Statement by The Honorable Philip E. Coyle, (Senior Advisor Center for Defense Information before the House Government Reform Committee National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations Subcommittee, Missile Defense Testing, June 11, 2002). See also:
- U.S. Missile Defense Programs at a Glance, (Arms Control Association, June 12, 2002)
- U.S. Plans I: Pentagon Wants Space-Based Laser Operational by 2008, (Global Security Newswire, June 11, 2002)
Many independent experts believe, that recent Pentagon's decision to classify information on missile defense tests was made in order to shield the MDA activity against criticism:
- A Hole In Our Defense System, (by Theodore Postol, Boston Globe, June 15, 2002)
- Democrats Complain About Missile Test Secrecy, (by Christopher Marquis, The New York Times, June 13, 2002)
- Secrecy on Missile Defense Grows, (by Bradley Graham, The Washington Post, Wednesday, June 12, 2002; Page A10)
- Levin Questions Missile Defense Agency's Classification Policy, (by Thomas Duffy, Inside Missile Defense, June 12, 2002)
Wednesday, June 12 House Armed Services Committee held hearings on the safety, security, and reliability of the US nuclear stockpile. Available on the Web are statements by John A. Gordon (National Nuclear Security Administration), RAdm John T. Byrd, USN, (Director of Plans and Policy, US Strategic Command), C. Bruce Tarter (Director of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory), John C. Browne (Director of Los Alamos National Laboratory), C. Paul Robinson (Director of Sandia National Laboratories), Dr. Frederick A. Tarantino, (President and General Manager of Bechtel Nevada), Dennis R. Ruddy, (President and General Manager of BWXT Pantex), John T. Mitchell, (President and General Manager of BWXT Y-12), David S. Douglass, (President of Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technology) and Robert A. Pedde (President of the Westinghouse Savannah River Company).
In defiance of decision of Federal authorities, Gov. Jim Hodges (D) ordered state troopers and other authorities to South Carolina's borders to stop federal shipments of plutonium that could begin arriving Savannah River Site from Rocky Flats, Colorado: S.C. Moves To Bar Entry Of Plutonium, (by Associated Press, The Washington Post , Saturday, June 15, 2002; Page A02)
Russia's Foreign Ministry expressed surprise over a U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton's accusation that Russia was continuing to provide Iran and other states with technology that could be used to develop and deliver weapons of mass destruction:
- U.S. Statement 'Surprises' Russia, (by Associated Press, Tuesday, June 11, 2002; 9:18 PM)
- U.S.-Russia Ties Hinge on Weapons, (by Edith M. Lederer, Associated Press, Monday, June 10, 2002; 11:48 PM)
- US Official Says Russia Must Curb Dangerous Exports, (by Reuters, June 11, 2002, 2:12 a.m. ET)
A new report Securing Nuclear Weapons and Materials: Seven Steps for Immediate Action released by Harvard's Project on Managing the Atom, warns that even after September 11, the size and the speed of the U.S. and international response to the threat of nuclear terrorism is not yet remotely commensurate with the magnitude of the threat: Securing Nuclear Weapons and Materials: Seven Steps for Immediate Action , (by Matthew Bunn, John P. Holdren and Anthony Wier, Nuclear Threat Initiative and the Managing the Atom Project, 20 May 2002)
Israel has acquired three diesel submarines that it is arming with newly designed cruise missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads, which would preserve the deterrent value of Israel's nuclear force: Israel Has Sub-Based Atomic Arms Capability, (by Walter Pincus, The Washington Post , Saturday, June 15, 2002; Page A01).
A meeting of scientists and experts in Krasnoyarsk-26 closed city decided to build a dry storage of spent nuclear fuel near the still unfinished wet storage facility: Dry Home For a Slightly "Calmed Down" Atom, - in Russian, (by Yuri Chuvashev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, June 17, 2002)
"...Specail environmental rehabilitation programs may cause in fact a danger even if all safety standards are observed. The problem is that the resources, allocated to health and environment protection, may be spent in a way harmful for health and environment..." (Radiation: A Sober Risk Analysis, - in Russian, (by I. Linge, Izvestia, June 16, 2002).
June 11, 2002
The U.S. will not be imposed by restrictions of the ABM Treaty anymore beginning Thursday, June 13. Walter C. Uhler, the Defense Contract Management Agency's Chief of Operations for Lockheed Martin Delaware Valley and well known analyst, who studied and written about Russian and military history for approximately 30 years, believes that, "...given America's technological utopianism, American efforts to weaponize space will persuade Russia's leaders that the U.S. is not content with a limited NMD system designed to protect against rogue states, but intends to pursue a system that renders it invulnerable to any retaliatory strike, including Russia's...": National Missile Defense and Russian American Relations, (by Walter C. Uhler, June 11, 2002). See also:
- Exiting ABM Without A Bang, (by Edwin J. Feulner, The Washington Times, June 10, 2002 Pg. 16)
- Unfinished Business: Russia and Missile Defense Under Clinton, (by Strobe Talbott, Arms Control Today, June 2002)
- Outer Space Treaty May Ban Strike Weapons, (by George Bunn and John B. Rhinelander, Arms Control Today, June 2002)
- U.S. and Russian Cooperation on Missile Defense: How likely? The Troubling Story of the Russian American Observation Satellite (RAMOS) Program, (by Wayne Glass, Center for Defense Information, May 29, 2002)
The Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency has decided to classify as "secret" details of targets and countermeasures to be used in all future flight intercept tests of the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system:
- Why the Secrecy Shield?, (by Philip E. Coyle III, The Washington Post, Tuesday, June 11, 2002; Page A25)
- Missile Data To Be Kept Secret, (by Paul Richter, Los Angeles Times, June 9, 2002, Pg. 1)
- Trust But Verify. What Will New Missile Test Secrecy Hide?, (Theresa Hitchens, Defense News, May 27, 2002)
We just finished our new reference section U.S. Missile Defense System (in Russian) which presents detailed information on plans of U.S. missile defense deployment, test results and technical problems to be solved. See also:
- Pentagon Eyes Additions To Anti-Missile Arsenal, (by Robert Wall, Aviation Week & Space Technology, June 10, 2002, Pg. 20)
- Pentagon Keeps Satellite System, Nixes New Naval Missile Defense, (by Wade Boese, Arms Control Today, June 2002)
- Nuclear-tipped Foolishness, (by Michael Kraig and Michael Roston, Foreign Policy in Focus, May 21, 2002)
President Bush summoned lawmakers Wednesday to press for Senate approval this year of the nuclear arms reduction treaty that he and Russian President Vladimir Putin signed last month. Dmitry Rogozin, head of the State Duma's international affairs committee, has also indicated, that Russian lawmakers may start debating new treaty as early as next week. Arms control experts continue to discuss the treaty advantages and drawbacks:
- Looking Back on One Hell of a Summit, (by Matt Bivens, The Moscow Times, June 10, 2002)
- Russia to start ratification process of arms control treaty this month, top lawmaker says, (by Associated Press, Thu Jun 6, 3:02 PM ET)
- Bush Seeks to Ratify New Nuke Treaty, (by Scott Lindlaw, Associated Press, Wednesday, June 5, 2002; 6:41 PM)
- The Jury Is Still Out, (by Wade Boese and J. Peter Scoblic, Arms Control Today, June 2002)
- Assessing the New U.S.-Russian Pact, (by John Holum, Arms Control Today, June 2002)
- A Beginning, Not an End, (by Daryll G. Kimball, Arms Control Today, June 2002)
- U.S., Russia Sign Treaty Cutting Deployed Nuclear Forces, (by Philipp C. Bleek, Arms Control Today, June 2002)
- U.S., Russia Issue Statement on Strategic Cooperation, (by Philipp C. Bleek, Arms Control Today, June 2002)
A successful flight test of 'Topol-M' ICBM was conducted on June 6, 2002 at Plesetsk test range:
- 'Topol" Is Big On Brains. On Accuracy As Well., - in Russian, (Krasnaya Zvezda, June 8, 2002)
- Mobile Missile Is Tested At Plesetsk Test Range, - in Russian, (Kommersant, June 4, 2002)
PIR Center disseminated the report that is focused on the studying of the perspectives of the American and the European programs reducing Russia’s WMD threats: Foreign Programs Reducing Russia's WMD Threats: Appraisals & Outlook, (a report for the CSIS Project “Strengthening Cooperative Threat Reduction with Russia: A US-European Initiative", PIR Center, April 15, 2002) - in PDF format
The same problem is dicussed in the following publications:
- Closing the Gaps. Securing High Enriched Uranium in the Former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, (by Robert L. Civiak, Federation of American Scientists, May 2002
- Dollars Convert Megahertzes to Megawatts, - in Russian, (Washington ProFile, June 4, 2002)
- U.S. Nonproliferation Programs-Update on Congressional Action, (Council for a Livable World, June 3, 2002)
- Uranium and Plutonium: Too Much Not To Be Stolen, - in Russian, (Washington ProFile, June 4, 2002)
- Russia Is Still A Mecca For Uranium Thefts, - in Russian, (Washington ProFile, June 3, 2002)
- Accomplishments of Selected Threat Reduction and Nonproliferation Programs in Russia, By Agency, (by Michael Roston and David Smigielski, Russian-American Nuclear Security Advisory Council, May 2002)
- Seminar 2: A Decade of Nunn-Lugar: U.S.-Former Soviet Union Threat Reduction and Nonproliferation Cooperation, (Russian-American Nuclear Security Advisory Council, Congressional Strategic Stability and Security Seminar Series, May 17, 2002)
Carnegie Endowment for World Peace published a new book Deadly Arsenals, (by Joseph Cirincione with Jon B. Wolfsthal and Miriam Rajkumar, Carnegie Endowment for World Peace, June 2002), which represent a comprehensive assessment available on the dangers nations face from weapons of mass destruction. Chapters devoted to nuclear programs of India and Pakistan are available on-line: India and Pakistan's Nuclear Capabilities.
The Bush administration has ordered conceptual design work started for a new $2 billion to $4 billion plant that would produce plutonium triggers for the U.S. nuclear weapons force beginning in 2020: (U.S. Orders Design of New Weapons Plant, by Walter Pincus, The Washington Post, Monday, June 3, 2002; Page A03).
The U.S. Energy Department conducted its 17th subcritical nuclear test Friday, amid reported protests from the governors of Hiroshima, Nagasaki and many other Japanese cities: U.S. Testing: Japanese Officials Protest U.S. Subcritical Nuclear Test, (by David Ruppe, Global Security Newswire, June 10, 2002)
In spite of improvement of U.S.-Russian relations the joint Russian-Iranian cooperation on nuclear energy remains a source of split among new partners:
- Russia's Risky Iran Connection, (The New York Times, June 10, 2002)
- Dealing on Nukes, (by Charles D. Ferguson, The Washington Post, Wednesday, June 5, 2002; Page A22)
- Bush, Putin Disagree on Russia-Iran Nuclear, Missile Cooperation, (by Alex Wagner, Arms Control Today, June 2002)
In comments that stunned many, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's top aide told reporters last week that what Japan calls its three non-nuclear principles could soon come under review: Nuclear Arms Taboo Is Challenged in Japan, (by Howard W. French, The New York Times , June, 8, 2002)
Dirty bombs are not mass killers, they are weapons designed to inspire panic and cause disruption: After a 'Dirty Bomb' Explodes, (The New York Times , June 11, 2002)
What Was New?
In 2002: January | February | March-May
In 2001: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 2000: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 1999: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 1998: January | February | March | April | May | June | July-September | October | November | December
In 1997: November | December
© Center for Arms Control, Energy and Environmental Studies at MIPT, 1999-2002Search the START Web Site