What was new on START Web site?
February, 2001
February 21, 2001
The report Precision Guided Weapons and Strategic Balance (in Russian), by Eugene Miasnikov, is now available on-line.President Vladimir V. Putin called on Europe and the NATO alliance to work with Russia on developing a common defense against missile attacks and presented a set of proposals to the NATO secretary general, Lord Robertson, who is visiting Moscow. Robertson said the plan was evidence that both NATO and Russia recognized the threat of missiles from unstable states and had to work together to counter it.
- Moscow Signaling a Change in Tone on Missile Defense, (by Michael R. Gordon, The New York Times, February 22, 2001)
- World Steps Deeper Into NMD Bog, (The Moscow Times, Thursday, Feb. 22, 2001. Page 8)
- 'Friends' to the Bitter End, (by Pavel Felgenhauer, The Moscow Times, Thursday, Feb. 22, 2001. Page 9)
- Russia - NATO: a New Start, - in Russian, (by Yuri Pankov, Krasnaya Zvezda, February 22, 2001)
- Three Years and All BMD Is There, - in Russian, (Obschaya Gazeta, February 22, 2001)
- Fencing With "Umbrellas", - in Russian, (by Valeriya Sychova, Segodnya, February 21, 2001)
- NATO Chief Promises Fair Hearing for Russian NMD Counter-offer, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, February 21, 2001)
- Putin Touts Limited Shield to NATO, (by Simon Saradzhyan, The Moscow Times, Wednesday, February 21, 2001, Page 1)
- NATO Reached Moscow, - in Russian, (Parlamentskaya Gazeta, February 21, 2001)
- Russia Proposed Creating a Non-Strategic European Antimissile Defense, - in Russian, (Komsomol'skaya Pravda, February 21, 2001)
- Putin Invites West to Work on a Defense for Missiles, (by Patrick E. Tyler, The New York Times, February 21, 2001)
- Russia Details Anti-Missile Alternative, (by Peter Baker and Susan B. Glasser, The Washington Post, Wednesday, February 21, 2001; Page A16)
- Russia Presses Missile Defense Plan, (by Vladimir Isachenkov, Associated Press, Tuesday, February 20, 2001; 4:52 p.m. EST)
- West Welcomes Russia's Missile Plan, Whatever it is, (by Reuters, Russia Today, February 20. 2001)
- Not A Confrontation, But a Dialog, - in Russian, (by Yuri Pankov, Krasnaya Zvezda, February 20, 2001) - an interview with NATO secretary general, George Robertson
- Russia Handed NATO with Proposals to Create A European Missile Defense, - in Russian, (Strana.Ru, February 20, 2001)
- Robertson Got an Exclusive for Missile Defense system Deployment from Russia, - in Russian, (Lenta.Ru, February 20, 2001)
- Russia and NATO Will Defend Europe Together, - in Russian, (Gazeta.Ru, February 20, 2001)
- Russia Hands NATO Low-Budget Missile Shield Plan, (by Reuters, Russia Today, February 20, 2001)
- National Missile Defense Is an Excuse to Militarize Space, - in Russian, (Utro.Ru, February 16, 2001)
U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said last week Russia was "part of the problem" in missile technology proliferation, which has made the United States want to build a national missile defense.U.S. Russia angrily rejected U.S. allegations.
- Never Say "Never", - in Russian, (by Alexander Chudodeyev, Segodnya, February 17, 2001) - an interview with Sergei Rogov, Director of the U.S. and Canada Institute
- Europe: US plans for missiles 'rubbish', (by Cottrell, Financial Times, February 17, 2001)
- Editorial: An empty threat, (Russia Journal, No.6, February 17, 2001)
- The United States Blamed Russia Again Yesterday, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, February 16, 2001)
- Russia Observes All Agreements, - in Russian, (Krasnaya Zvezda, February 16, 2001)
- America Scared the World by Russian Missile Technology, - in Russian, (by Leonid Gankin, Kommersant, February 16, 2001)
- "You are Helping to Rogue States", - in Russian, (by Maxim Yusin, Izvestiya, February 16, 2001)
- Russia and U.S. in Fresh Missile Spat, (by Patrick Lannin, The Moscow Times, February 16, 2001)
- Russia Angry On Missile Allegations, (by Deborah Seward, Associated Press, Thursday, Feb. 15, 2001; 3:39 p.m. EST)
- Russia Lashes out at U.S. Accusations of Arms Proliferation, (By Agence France Presse, Russia Today, February 15, 2001)
On February 15, 2001, the second international working meeting of experts on the problem of creating a global control system for the nonproliferation of missiles and missile technologies (GCS) was held in Moscow. Representatives of more than 70 countries and of the United Nations took part (Russian MFA Official Statement, February 15, 2001)
Prof. Theodore Postol, former Pentagon adviser, an american physicist and an expert on missile technologies, said in exclusive interview to the leading German newspaper, that he does not believe in success of the planned U.S. NMD system:
See also: The Bush Defense Agenda, (The New York Times, February 18, 2001)
- An American Physicist Criticises the Plan Of Pentagon, - in Russian, (by Yevgeni Grigor'yev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, February 16, 2001)
- "Die Sueddeutsche Zeitung" (Germany): "It is About A Provocation, Not Defense", - in Russian, (Strana.Ru, February 15, 2001) - translation of Theodore Postol's interview into Russian
China opposed U.S. plans to create national missile defense at the Disarmament Conference: Star Wars in Geneva, - in Russian, (by Igor Sedykh, Segodnya, February 20, 2001). On the attitude of China toward the U.S. national missile defense see also A Chinese Perspective on National Missile Defense, (by Dingli Shen, Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, February 20, 2001)
Russia test-fired nuclear-capable strategic missiles from air, land and sea on Friday:
- Military Flexes Its Nuclear Muscle, (The Moscow Times, February 19, 2001)
- Russia tests nuclear missiles after war of words with US, (by Marcus Warren, Daily Telegraph, February 17, 2001)
- Russia Tests Strategic Missiles, (by Susan B. Glaser, The Washington Post, Saturday, February 17, 2001; Page A25)
- Russian ICBM Hits Target, Winds up Command Post Training, (by Military News Agency, Russia Today, February 16, 2001)
- Russia Tests Missiles, Offers Europe Defense Deal, (by Reuters, Russia Today, February 16, 2001)
- Russia Fires Missiles From Air, Land and Sea, (by Reuters, Russia Today, February 16, 2001)
- Russia Launches Missile Tests, (by Jim Heintz, Associated Press, Friday, Feb. 16, 2001; 3:26 p.m. EST)
The Washington Times continues to insist that nuclear arms are deployed at Kaliningrad Region:
- Nuclear Arms in a Russian Enclave? EU Questions Kremlin, (by Barry James, International Herald Tribune, February 16, 2001)
- Report: U.S. Has Proof of Missiles in Kaliningrad, (by Reuters, The Moscow Times, February 16, 2001)
- Satellites pinpoint Russian nuclear arms in Baltics, (by Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, February 15, 2001)
"...What is missing, however,(in the package of Bush administration proposals on nuclear weapons policy - E.M.) is an appeal to the concept of strategic stability..." Tampering With Strategic Stability, (by Leon Fuerth, The Washington Post, Thursday, February 20, 2001)
Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye recently published an article Russia to Lose Its Nuclear Status, - in Russian, which was placed recently at the START web site.
Colonel Igor Novosyolov, Ret., who served over twenty years in the Main Engineering Directorate of the Strategic Rocket Forces, tells about development of defense of land based missiles: A Shelter for "Satan", - in Russian, (Krasnaya Zvezda, February 16, 2001)
The George Polk Award-winning National Security Archive at George Washington University published on the World Wide Web 20 previously secret U.S. government documents detailing the policy debate over anti-ballistic missile defenses in the 1960’s and early 1970’s: Missile Defense Thirty Years Ago: Deja Vu All Over Again?
Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye published the review on the book "The Nuclear Circulation: What Happened, What Is Going to Happen?" by Nikolay Chervov: History of Nuclear Disarmament, (by Vladimir Belous, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, February 16, 2001)
According to claims of Boris Spasski, the Director of "Rubin" Central Design Bureau, the picture of the "Kursk" accident is clear for experts. However, another thing is telling the truth to the broad audience. Members of the Ñommission, investigating the accident, disagree on this particular issue:
- Lawmaker Claims Kursk Recovery Useless in Finding out Disaster Causes, (by Military News Agency, Russia Today, February 15, 2001)
- Members of the Commission Know the Truth, But They Are Silent, by Alexander Yemelyanenkov, Novaya Gazeta, February 15, 2001)
Sinking Japanese fishing trawler by SSN Greeneville underscores the urgent need for an agreement on safety of undersea operations: Remembering "Kursk", - in Russian, (by Yuri Beketov, Krasnaya Zvezda, February 22, 2001)
State Duma Environmental Committee recommended to approve a package of laws, permitting import of spent nuclear fuel for reprocessing and storage. The Duma is scheduled to consider the documents today:
- Russia Is Going To Be a Nuclear Dump for $20 Bln, - in Russian, (by Ivan Panteleyev, Izvestiya, February 21, 2001)
- Radioactive Committee, - in Russian, (by Yekaterina Kats and Ivan Trefilov, Segodnya, February 20, 2001)
- US backs plan for Russia to import nuclear waste, (by Paul Brown, The Guardian, February 19, 2001)
- Nuclear Power: A Tainted Future? (By Charles Digges and Barnaby Thompson, The Moscow Times, February 19, 2001)
February 15, 2001
Germany's foreign minister Joschka Fischer returned back from Moscow after intensive negotiations with top Russian officials. One of the major topics was the problem of U.S. national missile defense. Mr. Fischer will be in Washington next week and he is expected to deliver the Moscow attitudes to the Bush administration. Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov is meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell on February 24.
- Does the U.S. Need Russia?, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev, Dip Courier, February 15, 2001)
- America Is Bored of Nursing, - in Russian, (Yevgeni Buy, Obschaya Gazeta, February 15, 2001)
- Germany and the Russian Federation Discuss the Missile Defense Problem, - in Russian, (by Yevgeni Grigor'yev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, February 14,2001)
- The German's Front Is Showing Up the Signs of Breaking Up, - in Russian, (by Boris Vinogradov, Izvestiya, February 14, 2001)
- Moscow Lost Its Advocates, - in Russian, (by Valeriya Sychyova, Segodnya, February 14, 2001)
- German Sees Russia Bending on Missiles, (by The New York Times, February 14, 2001)
- Do We Have To 'Accept' U.S. NMD?, (The Moscow Times, February 14, 2001)
- Fischer Says Russia Will Accept NMD, (By Anna Dolgov, The Moscow Times, February 13, 2001)
- Russia Pledges "Constructive" Approach on Missiles, (by Reuters, Russia Today, February 12, 2001)
- Germany's Fischer Says No Go-between on Missile Plan, (by Reuters, Russia Today, February 12, 2001)
- Powell Seen Meeting Ivanov Soon to Discuss Defense, (by Reuters, February 10, 2001)
"...Confrontation with the United States on ABM Treaty modification is not productive and it does not correspond to the national interests of Russia...": A Tango with Russia, (by Andrey Piontkovskii and Vitaly Tsygichko, Segodnya, February 14, 2001). See also the views of Sergei Rogov and Georgy Shakhnazarov:
- Where Will the Wind from Potomac Blow?, - in Russian (by Sergei Sumbayev, Krasnaya Zvezda, February 14, 2001)
- George Bush and Kremlin's Dreamers, - in Russian, (by Georgy Shakhnazarov, Wek, N 6, February 9, 2001)
As the Bush administration takes the first steps toward carrying out its campaign promise of a global missile defense, a stark reality is setting in: Bush's initiative carries heavy up front costs -- budgetary, political and diplomatic -- but the benefits to American security and foreign policy lay far off in the future.
- Space Rangers, (by Thomas L. Friedman, The New York Times, February 13, 2001)
- Is This Shield Necessary? (by Samuel R. Berger, The Washington Post, February 13, 2001)
- Missile Defense Is Still Just a Pie in the Sky, (by Roberto Suro, The Washington Post, February 12, 2001)
- Exact Target Of Missile-Defense System Being Pushed By Bush Is Still Unclear, (by Carla Anne Robbins, The Wall Street Journal, February 9, 2001)
Defense conference in Munich clearly demonstrated that European countries will not support the Russian current attitude toward the U.S. NMD:
- The United States Pull Out a Base from the Building of Security - in Russian, (by Vadim Solov'yov, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, February 9, 2001)
- New Cold War Warms Up, (By Pavel Felgenhauer, The Moscow Times, February 8, 2001)
- PM Changes Tone On Missile Shield, (by Paul Koring, Toronto Glob and Mail, February 8, 2001)
"...At present, space is far less militarized than any other realm of human activity. However, the abrogation of the ABM treaty would immediately open the way to two new types of offensive strategic weapons: space-based anti-satellite weapons and space-based anti-missile systems capable of destroying ICBMs either in the atmosphere or in space (or, potentially, on the ground)...": Security in Space, (by Vladimir Kozin, The Moscow Times, February 12, 2001). See also on the Chinese attitude on this problem in: China Attacks U.S. Missile Plans, (by The Associated Press, The Washington Post, Tuesday, February 13, 2001; 6:09 AM)
George Tenet's testimony in the Senate provoked a harsh reaction of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and numerous comments in the media:
- The C.I.A. Alarms: Russia Is Dangerous Not Because of Missiles But Because of "Imperial Habits", - in Russian, (Komsomol'skaya Pravda, February 10, 2001)
- The C.I.A. Regards Russia as Threatening to the U.S., - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, February 9, 2001)
- Declaration of Dislike, - in Russian, (by Alexander Chudodeyev, Segodnya, February 9, 2001)
- The American Senate Listened an Annual Report of the C.I.A. Director George Tenet, - in Russian, (Komsomol'skaya Pravda, February 9, 2001 ã.)
- Russain MFA Official Statement, February 9, 2001
- Russia Angry After CIA Chief Lists it As Threat, (by Reuters, Russia Today, February 9, 2001)
- CIA Chief Cites Proliferation, Terrorism Among Top Threats, (by Vernon Loeb and Walter Pincus, The Washington Post, February 7, 2001)
- "Worldwide Threat 2001: National Security in a Changing World", a Statement by Director of Central Intelligence George J. Tenet before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 07 February 2001.
President Bush ordered a comprehensive review of the nation's nuclear arsenal, a first step toward the unilateral cuts in warheads and missiles that he promised during last year's campaign:
See also:
- Russia welcomes U.S. intention to cut missiles, (Russia Journal, February 12, 2001)
- George Bush Deceives Europe, - in Russian, (by Stepan Osenchuk, Gazeta.Ru, February 9, 2001)
- Bush Takes First Step to Shrink Arsenal of Nuclear Warheads, (by Steven Lee Myers, The New York Times, February 9, 2001)
- Bush Will Disarm America In Order to Deploy NMD, - in Russian, (SMI.Ru, February 9, 2001)
- The U.S. Nuclear Debate: Issues of Concern, (by Theresa Hitchens, British American Security Information Council, February 2001)
- Rationale and Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Forces and Arms Control, (National Institute for Public Policy, January 2001) - in PDF format
President Bush pledged new spending for unmanned weapons and other futuristic military technology that he expects will quickly overshadow the tanks, aircraft carriers and other heavy weapons that once defined a nation's might:
- Bush Is Not Tired Of Telling About New Threats, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev and Vladimir Akhmadullin, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, February 15, 2001)
- Bush Details Plan to Focus Military on New Weaponry, (by David E.Sanger, The New York Times, February 14, 2001)
- Excerpts From Bush's Remarks on the Military, February 14, 2001
- Bush Vows Spending on Futuristic Weapons. Modernization Promised as President Suggests Some Programs Face Termination, (by Mike Allen, The Washington Post, Wednesday, February 14, 2001; Page A08)
We began publication of the Internet version of Eugene Miasnikov's report Precision Guided Weapons and Strategic Balance (in Russian), which caused much attention among experts. In nearest future the full report will be available on-line.
Experts question expediency of spent fuel imports and of "plutonium" project:
- Car's Radiation Starts From the Head of the Train, - in Russian, (by Ivan Trefilov, Segodnya, February 15, 2001)
- Seeking the Holy Grail For Nuclear Power, (by Charles Digges and Barnaby Thompson, The Moscow Times, February 12, 2001)
- Wanted: Windfall In Nuclear Waste, (by Susan B. Glasser, Washington Post, February 11, 2001, Sunday, February 11, 2001; Page A01)
- Russia as Nuclear Garbageman?, (Fred Weir, Christian Science Monitor, February 9, 2001)
- Why Russia Needs a Plutonium Project?, - in Russian, (by Gennady Voskresenskii, Wek, N 6, February 9, 2001) - an interview with Mikhail Solonin, Director of VNIINM and the Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Nuclear Power: A Tainted Future? (The St. Petersburg Times, February 9, 2001)
- A Wholesale Nuclear Proposal, - in Russian, (by Yekaterina Kats, Segodnya, February 8, 2001)
- Nuclear wasteland faces a new threat, (Craig Nelson, Sydney Morning Herald, February 7, 2001)
At the Russian START Forum: on a speed of ICBM warheads near their targets and technical capabilities to track bombers fr
February 7, 2001
Speaking at a defense conference in Munich Russian Security Council secretary Sergei Ivanov on Sunday attacked U.S. plans to deploy a national missile defense (NMD) shield, which he said would set the stage for an arms race in outer space:
- The United States Again Insist on NMD Creation, - in Russian, (by Vadim Solovyov and Yevgeni Grigor'yev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, February 6, 2001)
- Rumsfeld's Ultimatum, - in Russian, (by Vissarion Sisnyov, Trud, February 6, 2001)
- Opinions Have Not Changed in Munich, - in Russian, (by Alexander Sabov, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, February 6, 2001)
- Powell Repeated Bush's Words, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, February 6, 2001)
- Will a Putin - Bush Dialog Be Formed? - in Russian, (by Vasili Safronchuk, Sovetskaya Rossiya, February 6, 2000)
- The Missile Offensive, (The Washington Post, February 6, 2001)
- NATO Is 'An Essential Forum' For The Missile-Defense Debate, (Joseph Fitchett, International Herald Tribune, February 6, 2001) - an interview with NATO Secretary-General George Robertson,
- Russia Says U.S. Antimissile Plan Means an Arms Race, (by Patrick E. Tyler, The New York Times, February 6, 2001)
- Europe warms to missile defense, (by David R. Sands, The Washington Times, February 6, 2001)
- Solana: U.S. Can Deploy Shield, (by Barry Schweid, The Washington Post, February 5, 2001)
- NATO Enlargement Could Sink Arms Treaty, Russia Says, (by Reuters, Russia Today, February 5, 2001)
- Who is Against Missile Defense?, - in Russian, (by Oleg Odnokolenko, Segodnya, February 5, 2001)
- Ivanov Warns of Space Arms Race, (By Adam Tanner, The Moscow Times, February 5, 2001)
- News Analysis: Allies' Mood on 'Star Wars' Shifts, (By Michael R. Gordon, The New York Times, February 5, 2001)
- Sergei Ivanov: "Russia Is Capable To Give an ANswer to U.S. NMD Plans", - in Russian, (Strana.Ru, February 4, 2001)
- Rumsfeld Defends Missile Shield To Apprehensive Allies in Europe, (By Thomas E. Ricks, The Washington Post, February 4, 2001)
- U.S. Tries Defusing Allies' Opposition to Missile Defense, (by Michael R. Gordon, The New York Times, February 4, 2001)
- The Shield's Tough Sell, (By Patrick E. Tyler, The New York Times, February 4, 2001)
- Rumsfeld Defends U.S. Missile Defense Plan, (By Reuters, The New York Times, February 3, 2001)
- Missile Defense Is Debated In Munich, - in Russian, (by Igor Devin, Segodnya, February 3, 2001)
- Problems With NATO Once Again, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, February 1, 2001)
Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov proposed new disarmament initiatives last Friday in Geneva:
- Ivanov Asked Seneca for Help, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Gornostayev and Il'ya Kedrov, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, February 2, 2001)
- Russian Wants Dialogue With U.S. on Limited Missile Defenses, (by Patrick E. Tyler, The New York Times, February 2, 2001)
- Ivanov Seeks U.S. Dialogue on NMD Shield, (by Reuters, Russia Today, February 1, 2001)
- Statement by H.E.Mr. Igor IVANOV Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation at the plenary meeting of the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, February 1, 2001
- Seneca Will Help to Solve the Missile Defense Problem, - in Russian, (SMI.Ru, February 1, 2001)
Russian official attitude toward ABM Treaty remains unchanged. Ambassador Yuriy Kapralov, Director, Department for Security Affairs and Disarmament, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation elaborated on the Russian official position: Effects of National Missile Defense on Arms Control and Strategic Stability, (presentation at forum "The Missile Threat and Plans for Ballistic Missile Defense: Impact on Global Security" (Rome, 18-19 January 2001). See also:
- A Star Marshal, - in Russian, (by Oleg Odnokolenko, Segodnya, February 6, 2001)
- Russia Ready to Revive Soviet Systems to Combat NMD, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, February 5, 2001)
- Russia Insist On Keeping the ABM Treaty Unchanged, - in Russian, (by Igor Sedykh, Segodnya, February 2, 2001)
- Russia Steps up Campaign Against U.S. Missile Defense Plans, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, February 2, 2001)
- Lawmaker Promises Responses to U.S. NMD Deployment, (by Military News Agency, Russia Today, February 1, 2001)
- Russia I Against Changing the ABM Treaty, - in Russian, (Krasnaya Zvezda, January 31, 2001)
- Russia's Military Shoots Down Bush Plan to "Update" ABM Treaty, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, January 30, 2001)
Russian Foreign Ministry criticized recent reports of the US military conducting training exercises to practice "Star Wars" scenarios:
- Colorado Firing Exercises, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Safonov, Izvestiya, February 3, 2001)
- No - to "Star Wars", - in Russian, (by Dmitri Litovkin, Krasnaya Zvezda, February 3, 2001)
- A New-Old Pentagon's Hit: "Star Wars", - in Russian, (by Vladimir Tuchkov, Vesti.Ru, February 2, 2001)
- Russia Blasts U.S. "Star Wars" Training Exercises, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, February 2, 2001)
- Official Statement of the Russian Foreign Ministry, February 1, 2001.
- Space Is Playing Field For Newest War Game, (By Thomas E. Ricks, The Washington Post, January 29, 2001)
Russian experts offer ways to overcome the deadlock in nuclear arms reductions and the missile defense problem:
- Stability At a New Basis, - in Russian, (by Constantin Cherevkov, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, February 2, 2001)
- Intermediate Agreements Are Needed, - n Russian, (by Yevgeni Maslin, Ivan Safranchuk and Yevgeni Silin, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, February 1, 2001)
- We Entered to the "Second Nuclear Century", - in Russian, (by Marina Kalashnikova, Dip Courier, February 1, 2001)
Vladimir Petrovskii, General Secretary of Conference on Disarmament, Deputy General Secretary of the United Nations: The Conference on Disarmament Makes No Headway, - in Russian, (Dip Courier, February 1, 2001)
"...The leadership of the Army and Navy did not have any strategy of the reform of the Armed Forces. They do not have it either. The things we can watch now are too far from worrying about true enforcing defense capability. Unfortunately, they look as a fight of personal ambitions, a sort of "lugging of a rope...", (The Military Reform Became A Circling Around, - in Russian, Mikhail Khodaryonok, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, February 2, 2001) See also:
- Peculiarities of a National Military Reform, - in Russian, (by Oleg Odnokolenko, Segodnya, February 3, 2001)
- "The Military Reform Will Not Be Such, As Kvashnin Suggested", - in Russian, (by Igor Korotchenko, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, February 3, 2001) - an interview with Andrei Nikolayev, the Chair of the State Duma Defense Committee
OLMA Press agency published a book The Nuclear Circulation: What Happened, What Is Going to Happen? by Nikolay Chervov, former Head of the Directorate for International Agreements of the General Staff, the Soviet Armed Forces. The author analyzes the negotiation process on limiting and reductions of nuclear arms of the U.S.A. and the Soviet Union (Russia) since the 1960-s until these days.
Should Russia approve importing spent fuel for reprocessing? The discussion continues:
- Russia Will Not Be a "Nuclear Dump", - in Russian, (by Sergei Voyeykov, Krasnaya Zvezda, February 2, 2001)
- Minatom Lies About Safe Transportation Of Nuclear Waste Through Russia, (By Vladimir Kuznetsov and Vladimir Slivyak, Ecodefense, January 27, 2001)
At the Russian START Forum: on heavy missiles, prospects for U.S. strategic arms reductions and other issues.
What Was New?
In 2001: January
In 2000: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 1999: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 1998: January | February | March | April | May | June | July-September | October | November | December
In 1997: November | December
Search the START Web Site
© Center for Arms Control, Energy and Environmental Studies at MIPT, 1999-2001