What was new on START Web site?
January, 2001
January 31, 2001
In an exclusive comment for the START web site "Russia to Lose Its Nuclear Status" Colonel Pyotr Romashkin discusses the recent presidential decree on reforming the Russian Rocket Forces. See also:
- "Rocketeers" Have No Choice, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Safronov, Izvestiya, January 27, 2001)
- Intelligence Officers Do Not Understand Rocketeers, - in Russian, (by Viktor Litovkin, Obschaya Gazeta, January 25, 2001)
- A Military Breed, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Litovkin, Izvestiya, January 25, 2001)
- Problems of Ensuring Security of the Strategic Rocket Forces Were Considered at the Meeting of an Expanded Military Council of the SRF, - in Russian, (by Vladislav Kuznezov, ITAR-TASS, January 25, 2001)
- Defense Spending Could Double, (By Simon Saradzhyan, The Moscow Times, January 24, 2001)
- Peculiarities of the National Infantry, (Trud, January 24, 2001)
- Vladimir Putin Approved Plans of Military, - in Russian, (by Alexandr Orlov, Strana.Ru, January 22, 2001)
Experts continue the discussion on role of Russian nuclear weapons:
- Deadly Dangerous Illusions, - in Russian, (by Vyacheslav Vukolov and Alexander Lavrent'yev, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, January 26, 2001) - a discussion with Alexei Arbatov, Deputy Chair of the State Duma Defense Committee.
- Economic Realities and Priorities of Defense Security, - in Russian, (by Sergei Rogov, Director of the US and Canada Institute, a presentation at the Center for Strategic Studies)
President Bush confirmed that he intended to keep his campaign pledge to reduce the nation's nuclear weapons as he moved ahead with construction of a defense against ballistic missiles:
- Four Star Wars, - in Russian, (by Yevgeni Bye, Izvestiya, January 30, 2001)
- Missile-Defense Project Race Begins As Groups Vie For Lucrative Contracts, (by Greg Jaffe and Anne Marie Squeo, The Wall Street Journal, January 30, 2001)
- Bush Stands For ABM Treaty Modification, - in Russian, (Utro.Ru, January 29, 2001)
- Bush Repeats Call for Arms Reduction and Missile Shield, (by Steven Lee Myers, The New York Times, January 27, 2001)
- Bush Affirms Defense Plans, (by Mike Allen, The Washington Post, January 27, 2001)
- The Chief of Pentagon Thinks that ABM Treaty Is Outdated, - in Russian, (Lenta.Ru, January 27, 2001)
- Bush Announced, that He Is Going to Cut U.S. Nuclear Arsenal, - in Russian, (Lenta.Ru, January 27, 2001)
- Bush Will Reduce Nuclear Arsenal in Russia's Joy, - in Russian, (RBC, January 27, 2001)
- Rumsfeld Planning Missile Defense, (by Robert Burns, Associated Press, January 26, 2001)
- Missile defense and arms reduction, (by Peter Malone, Boston Globe, January 24, 2001)
- Missile Defense Urgency, (by James Hackett, The Washington Times, January 23, 2001)
- Rumsfeld Armed With Know-How to Take On Defense, (by Vernon Loeb, The Washington Post, January 22, 2001)
President Putin said, that a complex and delicate work with Bush administration lies ahead on ABM preservation. He expressed a hope for a constructive dialog.
- Russia Presses Germany on NMD, (By Simon Saradzhyan, The Moscow Times, January 31, 2001)
- Russia's Military Shoots Down Bush Plan to "Update" ABM Treaty, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, January 30, 2001)
- Bush's Slow Boat to Russia, (By Jim Hoagland, The Washington Post, January 28, 2001)
- Ivanov Proposes Meeting, Powell Agrees As Missile Defense Fight Heats up, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, January 27, 2001)
- The Work with Bush Will Be "Complex and Delicate", - in Russian, (by Dmitri Kosyrev, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, January 27, 2001)
- Putin Detects Positive Bush Signal on Arms, (by Reuters, Russia Today, January 26, 2001)
- Putin Warns U.S. Against Missile Defense Buildup, Enlarging NATO, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, January 26, 2001)
- Brilliance and Misery of Bush Jr., - in Russian, (by Sergei Rogov, Wek, N 4, January 26, 2001)
See also on Russian initiative in creation of global defense from limited nuclear strikes: Multinational Missile Defense As An Element of Globalism, - in Russian, (by O. Matveyev, Obozrevatel'-Observer, N 12, 2000) and on history of Moscow ABM system deployment: There Is No Analog Till Now, - in Russian, (by Oleg Golubev, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, January 26, 2001)
The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs refuted an existence of a "message" of the President of Russia to the new United States President setting out Moscow's "secret approaches" to START-ABM problems, including "proposals" for talks to modify the ABM Treaty of 1972:
- Russian MFA official statement, January 25, 2001
- Putin Writes to Bush, Wants Better U.S.-Russia Ties, (by Reuters, Russia Today, January 24, 2001)
The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs denies assertions expressed in the interview of Robert T. Grey, the United States Permanent Representative to the Conference on Disarmament (CD), published in the December issue of Arms Control Today: Statement by Alexander Yakovenko, the official spokesman of Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, (January 29, 2001)
Arms control experts discuss the future of U.S.-Russian cooperation on non-proliferation: U.S.-Russian Non-proliferation Cooperation: Setting Priorities for the Future, (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Event, Summary of presentations, January 24, 2001)
Russia plans to build 40 nuclear reactors by 2020 to prevent a potential "energy crisis" deputy atomic energy minister Boulat Nigmatulin announced Monday: Russia Plans to Build 40 Nuclear Reactors by 2020, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, January 31, 2001)
According to many Russian experts, Russia is not ready yet to import spent nuclear fuel for reprocessing:
- Enriched by Uranium, - in Russian, (by Roman Shleynov, Novaya Gazeta, January 29, 2001)
- Stop Russia Becoming "Nuclear Waste-dump", Ecologists Tell Putin, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, January 29, 2001)
- Money Over (Nuclear) Matter, (by Vlada Melkova, The Russia Journal , January 27, 2001)
- Radioactive Cars, - in Russian, (by Yekaterina Ivanova, Segodnya, January 24, 2001)
- Russia Unable to Reprocess Foreign Nuclear Waste, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, January 24, 2001)
- Pile Up, Please, - in Russian, (by Judith Perera, Vesti.Ru, January 23, 2001)
At the Russian START Forum: on an adequate Russian response to NMD deployment and other issues.
January 23, 2001
Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye published an article on current status, problems and future of the Strategic Rocket Forces development: A Pace of Poplar Forest's Growth Slowed Down, - in Russian, (by Sergei Sokut, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, January 19, 2001). See also:
- A Battle of Ambitions, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Safonov, Izvestiya, January 23, 2001)
- Tatischevo Titmouse, (by Vitali Moroz, Krasnaya Zvezda, January 23, 2001)
Moscow and Kiev are preparing to renew a joint production of heavy ICBMs: Russian Genera Is A Hostage Of "Kuchmagate", - in Russian, (by Andrei Korbut, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, January 19, 2001)
President Bush reiterated his commitment to the NMD deployment. Russian press comments remarks of key officials of the new U.S. administration on NMD and future of U.S. - Russian relations:
- What We Can Expect from Bush, Jr.? - in Russian, (by Vasili Safronchuk, Sovetskaya Rossiya, January 23, 2001)
- George Bush Promised to Deploy NMD and Withdraw From the ABM Treaty of 1972, - in Russian, (Lenta.Ru, January 19, 2001)
- Bush Aides Upbeat on Possible Missile Defense, Iraq Progress, (by Reuters, Russia Today, January 18, 2001)
- The Fog Clears Away, - in Russian, (by Leonid Nikolayev, Sovetskaya Rossiya, January 16, 2001)
- Cold War Winners Take it All, (by Alexander Golts, The Russia Journal, January 16, 2001)
- Focus Shifting in U.S.-Russia Relations, (by Peter Baker and Susan B. Glasser, The Washington Post, Monday, January 15, 2001; Page A15)
"...An early announcement (of NMD deployment - E.M.) by the new president would be a dramatic signal that the Cold War policy of mutual assured destruction is dead and a new era is beginning. Such a bold step would immediately change the debate and mark Mr. Bush as a man of action. Russia and China would stop complaining and start negotiating to get the best deal they can. The allies would stop whining and scramble to assure that they, too, will be defended...", (Missile Defense Urgency, by James Hackett, The Washington Times, January 23, 2001)
The Russian official attitude remains unchanged: Russia is ready to accept further limits to its missile arsenal provided the U.S. abides to the ABM Treaty
- Russia halts military cuts as hawks take over in US, (by Ian Traynor, Guardian, Thursday, January 18, 2001)
- Russia Ratchets up Pressure on the U.S. over ABM Treaty, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, January 16, 2001)
Russia is gratified by the news that on January 11, 2001, the Supreme Rada of Ukraine ratified the Memorandum of Understanding relating to the Soviet-American Treaty on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems that defines Ukraine as a successor state under the Treaty (Russian MFA Official Statement, January 15, 2001)
Many Russian experts suggest, that Russia should soften its attitude toward the ABM Treaty modification as deployment of the U.S. national missile defense becomes inevitable. Some representatives of the military industrial complex propose deployment of a Russian missile defense.
- Vladimir Dvorkin: The State May Choose Any Necessary Steps to Ensure Its Security, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Safonov, Izvestiya, January 22, 2001)
- "One Need Not To Be Scared Of Russia's Objections", - in Russian, (by Nikolay Zimin, Segodnya, January 20, 2000)
- An Antimissile Shield For the Continent, - in Russian, (by Mikhail Khodarenok, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, January 19, 2001)
- When "The Thing" Comes, How Will the Earth Respond?, - in Russian, (by Natalia Yachmennikova, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, January 19, 2000)
- Arms Race, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Safonov, Izvestiya, January 18, 2001)
- To Forgive and Let Them Do, - in Russian, (by Oleg Odnokolenko, Segodnya, January 17, 2001) - comments of General Alexandr Piskunov, a member of the State Duma
- A (Confidential) Letter From Washington, (The Russia Journal, January 15, 2001)
- The United States Prepare The Stick and the Carrot, - in Russian, (by Vladimir Skosyrev, Vremya MN, January 14, 2001)
French Defense Minister Alain Richard said Paris and Moscow were committed to a major 1972 disarmament treaty and urged Washington to clarify its proposals for a missile defense system.
- French Defense Minister Alain Richard: «The ABM Treaty Must Remain», - in Russian, (by Oleg Denisov, Wek, N 3, January 19, 2001)
- On the Way to the Strategic Partnership, (by Yuri Pankov, Krasnaya Zvezda, January 18, 2001)
- French Minister Interested in Russian Missile Plan, (by Reuters, Russia Today, January 18, 2001)
- French Minister Discusses U.S. Missile Plans in Moscow, (by Reuters, Russia Today, January 17, 2001)
In the latest issue of Arms Control Today (January-February 2001:
- Campaign Promises vs. Real World Responsibilities, by Spurgeon M. Keeny, Jr.
- Bush Assemble Pro-Missile Defense National Security Team, (by Wade Boese)
- The Uncertain Future of U.S.-Russian Cooperative Security, (by Kenneth N. Luongo)
- U.S., Russia Sign Missile- and Space-Launch Notification Deal, (by Philipp C. Bleek)
- Moscow Reportedly Moves Tactical Nuclear Arms to Baltics, (by Philipp C. Bleek)
- Findings and Recommendations Concerning the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, (Shalikashvili’s report).
- Shalikashvili Issues Report Supporting Test Ban Treaty, (by Philipp C. Bleek)
- The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty: Signatories and Ratifiers
Academician Viktor Mikhailov, former Russian Minister of Nuclear Energy (1992-1998) shares his views on the Russian nuclear policy in an interview to Wek weekly: Nuclear Interests of "Putin's Doctrine", (by Gennadi Voskresenski, Wek, N 3, January 19, 2001)
Nezavisimaya Gazeta comments on recent Russian-Azerbaijan agreements on the early warning radar at Gabala: Status of the Radar at Gabala Remains Undefined, - in Russian, (by Igor Korotchenko, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, January 19, 2001)
Russian officials consider ungrounded the claims on alleged deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in Kaliningrad Region: A Dish for a Second Warming-Up, - in Russian, (by Viktor Litovkin, Obschaya Gazeta, January 18, 2001)
The report prepared by the Baker-Cutler panel, is available now on-line: A Report Card on the Department of Energy's Nonproliferation Programs with Russia, (Secretary of Energy Advisory Board, U.S. DOE, January 10, 2001)
The recovered remnants of the "Kursk" torpedo tube irrefutably prove, that the submarine sank because of an explosion of the so called "practical" torpedo:
- Demarche of the General Designer of the Submarine, - in Russian, (by Vadim Solovyov, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, January 19, 2001)
- Everybody Knows Why "Kursk" Sank, - in Russian, (by Marina Tokareva, Obschaya Gazeta, January 18, 2001)
USEC Inc , a seller of uranium fuel services for commercial power plants, was permitted to pursue a deal with Russia to import uranium for fuel:
- USEC Allowed to Pursue Russia Uranium Deal, (by Reuters, Russia Today, January 22, 2001)
- The United States Intensify Imports of the Russian Uranium, - in Russian, (Lenta.Ru, January 22, 2001)
Yevgeni Adamov suggests that efficiency of "YeES Rossii" Joint Stock Company with the one of nuclear powered stations should be compared: Minister of Nuclear Energy Yevgeni Adamov: "Let's Compete", (by Mikhail Kozyrev, Vedomosti, January 17, 2000)
Russian public continues discussion on proposed changes in the legislation to allow radioactive waste imports:
- Public opposition against nuclear waste import grows in Russia, (Vladislav Nikiforov, Bellona, January 18, 2001)
- We Will Become the Nation of Untouchable, - in Russian, (by Irina Samakhova, Obschaya Gazeta, January 18, 2001)
- The West Will Not Forget Us Until Getting Rid Of All Its Nuclear Wastes, - in Russian, (by Igor Ostrezov, Parlamentskaya Gazeta, January 17, 2001)
- Will Russia Become Rich On Nuclear Wastes? - in Russian, (by Sergei Trusevich, Parlamentskaya Gazeta, January 17, 2001)
In the recent issue of Yadernaya Bezopasnost' (November-December, 2000):
- Peace Program a la Putin, (by Aleksander Golts)
- To Run Down and Leave Behind? Or Remain Behind Forever? What Does Putin-Adamov Energy Initiative Promise? (by Mikhail Pogorely)
- "A Very Timely Initiative", (by Vladimir Dernovoi)
- On Security - With A Data At Hands, (by Vladimir Kuznezov)
- MOX Fuel Use in Russian Nuclear Reactors, (by Vladimir Kuznezov)
- What Is the Danger Of MOX Fuel? (by Edwin Lyman)
At the Russian START Forum: on a possibility of U.S.-Russian cooperation in development of ballistic missile defenses and other issues.
January 13, 2001
President Vladimir Putin has dismissed reports that Russia may have deployed tactical nuclear weapons in Kaliningrad, the Russian Baltic enclave. President Aleksander Kwasniewski renewed Polish calls for Russia to allow international inspections in Kaliningrad:
- U.S. Raises Kaliningrad Nuclear Reports With Russia, (by Reuters, Russia Today, January 13, 2001)
- Russia seen relying on nuke, germ weapons, (by Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, January 11, 2001)
- Kremlin brinkmanship, (The Washington Times, January 11, 2001)
- Ready for the Worst Case, (by Pavel Felgenhauer, The Moscow Times, January 11, 2001)
- Warheads Have Not Been Found, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Safronov, Izvestiya, January 10, 2001, p. 4)
- Putin: Reports About Nuclear Arms 'Rubbish', (The Moscow Times, January 10, 2001)
- Possible Re-Deployment of Russian Warheads Was Discussed, - in Russian, (Baltic News Service, January 8, 2001)
- Putin denies Kaliningrad nuclear arms reports, (by Marcus Warren, Daily Telegraph, 8 January 2001)
- Polish President Renews Call for Inspection of Russian Enclave, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, January 9, 2001)
- Putin Dismisses U.S. Reports That Russia Shipped Nuclear Weapons for Baltic Fleet, (by Patrick E. Tyler, The New York Times, January 7, 2001)
- Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Nature of the Problem, (by William Potter and Nikolai Sokov, CNS Report, January 4, 2001)
Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye comments on mutual U.S. and Russian accusations in relation with TNWs and START I violation: A Hostile Political Sign, - in Russian, (by Vadim Solovyov, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, January 12, 2001)
"...There is no sense in negotiating further strategic reductions. Weakness of the Russian attitude at negotiations can be explained mainly by internal economical factors...", (A Range of Parity. STARt III Treaty - Is There Need For It?, - in Russian, by Valentin Popov, Nezavisimoye Voyennoye Obozreniye, January 12, 2001)
China and Russia are negotiating their first political treaty since an ill-fated peace and friendship pact at the outset of the Cold War, united this time by a desire to counter U.S. preeminence in world affairs and oppose U.S. proposals for building a missile defense shield, The Washington Post reports: Beijing And Moscow To Sign Pact. Stronger Ties Sought To Check U.S. Influence, (by John Pomfret, The Washington Post, Saturday, January 13, 2001; Page A01). See also: China Calls on U.S. to Scrap Missile Shield Plans, (by Reuters, Russia Today, January 12, 2001)
German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer will travel to Washington as soon as possible for talks on issues including the development of a disputed missile defense system backed by President-elect Bush: Germany, U.S. To Discuss Missiles, (by The Associated Press, Friday, January 12, 2001; 9:12 AM)
Rumsfeld has been a leading advocate of NMD in the past. There is no reason to believe that he will alter that position. Just recently, a commission led by Rumsfeld said, that the United States must improve its ability to defend its satellites and other critical space systems in order to avoid a surprise attack with the potential to become a "space Pearl Harbor":
- The Expansive Agenda at Defense, (The New York Times, January 13, 2001)
- Bush Candidate for Defense Job Sees Overhaul, (by Steven Lee Myers, The New York Times, January 12, 2001)
- Defense Nominee Backs Missile Shield, (by Rowan Scarborough, The Washington Times, January 12, 2001)
- Rumsfeld Says Building A Missile Shield Will Be A Top Priority As Defense Chief, (by Greg Jaffe, Wall Street Journal, January 12, 2001)
- Rumsfeld, at hearing, backs missile shield, (by John Donnelly, Boston Globe, January 12, 2001)
- We'll Back Star Wars, Says Hague, (by George Jones, London Daily Telegraph, January 12, 2001)
- U.S. Should Improve Defense of Satellites, Panel Advises, (by James Risen, The New York Times, January 12, 2001)
- Rumsfeld Impresses Armed Services Panel, (by Thomas E. Ricks, The Washington Post, Friday, January 12, 2001; Page A16)
- Rumsfeld's Rule, (by Colonel Daniel Smith (Ret.), The Moscow Times, Friday, Jan. 12, 2001, Page 8)
- Put Missile Defense On 'Cruise' Control, (by Ken Adelman, Wall Street Journal, January 11, 2001)
- Missile Shield Illusions, (The New York Times, January 10, 2001)
Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, supporting a decade of questions about the Patriot missile's performance, said Raytheon Co.'s famous antimissile system failed to work in the Persian Gulf War: The Patriot Gulf missile 'didn't work', (by John Aloysius Farrell, Boston Globe, January 13, 2001)
The Russian President never received "The Plan for build-up and development of the Armed Forces for 2001-2005" from the Ministry of Defense, which was to be signed by Vladimir Putin in early December. In spite of Security Council decisions and tough requirements of the Supreme Commander, Marshal Igor Sergeyev refused to approve the draft, prepared at the General Staff. Army General Anatoli Kvashnin, on the other hand, has not approved another draft, prepared under the supervision of the Defense Minister: Bush Corrected Kvashnin, - in Russian, (by Viktor Litovkin, Obschaya Gazeta, January 11, 2001)
A blue-ribbon task force headed by two elder statesmen, Republican Howard H. Baker Jr. and Democrat Lloyd N. Cutler, recommended that the United States spend up to $30 billion over the next eight to 10 years to improve security over Russia's nuclear stockpile.
- Nuclear Items Sold by Russia to Iran Pose an Obstacle, Panel Finds, (by James Risen, The New York Times, January 11, 2001)
- Panel Urges $30 Billion to Secure Russian Nuclear Arms, (by Walter Pincus, The Washington Post, Thursday, January 11, 2001; Page A21)
- An Unacceptable Risk, (by Howard H. Baker Jr. and Lloyd Cutler, The Washington Post, January 11, 2001)
A new report by the General Accounting Office says a program to refurbish and extend the life of the nation's aging nuclear warheads is behind its original schedule, 70 percent over budget and plagued by management difficulties (Effort on Missile Upkeep Falters, Report Finds, by James Glanz, The New York Times, January 13, 2001)
At the request of President Clinton, Gen. John Shalikashvili, a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, proposed a set of practical steps that the next administration could take to address the Senate's concerns about the treaty and make it possible for George W. Bush to resubmit it for a successful ratification vote in the near future:
- Reviving the Test Ban Treaty, (The New York Times, January 9, 2001)
- The Test Ban Solution, (by John M. Shalikashvili, The Washington Post, Saturday, January 6, 2001; Page A21)
- Revival of Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Urged, (by Steven Mufson, The Washington Post, Friday, January 5, 2001; Page A17)
CNN founder Ted Turner and former senator Sam Nunn (D-Ga.) formally unveiled plans for a Washington-based nonprofit organization 'Nuclear Threat Initiative' that will focus on safeguarding nuclear weapons and fissile materials in the former Soviet Union. Turner, said he would give $250 million to the Nuclear Threat Initiative over the next five years.
- Nunn, Turner Pick A Fight, (by Mary Mcgrory, The Washington Post, Thursday, January 11, 2001; Page A03)
- Turner Funds Effort Against Nuclear Arms, (by Reuters, Russia Today, January 9, 2001)
- Turner, Nunn Unveil 'Nuclear Threat Initiative', (by Vernon Loeb, The Washington Post, Tuesday, January 9, 2001; Page A18)
Academician Igor Spasski, the General Designer of the "Rubin" Design Bureau made publicly a statement on reasons for "Kursk" accident. His statement allows to assume that in fact the dominating version in the governmental investigation commission is a self-ignition and subsequent detonation of the submarine's on-board ammunition: A Turning Point in Solution of the Enigma of "Kursk's" Tragedy, - in Russian, (by Vadim Solovyov, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, January 12, 2001)
Russia and the West have not yet started implementation of the agreement on elimination of plutonium released from weapons: International Disagreements, - in Russian, (by Yekaterina Kaz, Segodnya, January 12, 2001)
Alarmed by the rapid development of China's nuclear program in the early 1960's, the Kennedy and Johnson administrations considered bombing targets there and killing the experts, as well as supplying India with nuclear weapons, recently declassified documents show (60's Administrations Considered Bombing Nuclear Sites in China, by The Associated Press, The New York Times, January 13, 2001)
At the Russian START Forum: on a possibility of U.S.-Russian cooperation in development of ballistic missile defenses and other issues
January 5, 2001
Moscow will respond to any unilateral move by the incoming U.S. administration to deploy a national missile defense shield without Russia's consent, the head of the country's nuclear rocket force said recently. Eugene Miasnikov, editor of the START Web site, commented on the situation with the ABM Treaty in his interview to Vesti.Ru: (Our Answer to Bush, - in Russian, by Ol'ga Shorina, Vesti.Ru, December 26, 2000). See also:
- Russia Rocket Chief Warns U.S. on Missile Defense, (by Reuters, Russia Today, December 27, 2000)
- Russia Has Developed Reciprocal Measures in Case the U.S. Withdraw from the ABM Treaty, - in Russian, (Strana.Ru, December 26, 2000)
- Russia Is Prepared to the U.S. Withdrawal from the ABM Treaty, - in Russian, (Lenta.Ru, December 26, 2000)
- Russia Has Prepared Measures if U.S. Deploys National Missile Defense System, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, December 26, 2000)
- Star Wars (the Second Episode), - in Russian, ( by Ol'ga Shorina, Vesti.Ru, December 26, 2000)
On Thursday Russia's foreign ministry accused the United States of breaching the START-1 nuclear disarmament treaty by destroying only one of the three stages of its MX ballistic missiles (Russian MFA Official Statement, January 4, 2001). See also Ivan Sidorov's paper How Responsible Are the Sides in Implementing the START I Treaty? (in Russian), Gennadi Khromov exclusive comment on "Hera" MRBM and a comment of our Center's experts on upload potential of "ÌÕ" ICBM.
Russia denied a U.S. newspaper report that it was deploying tactical nuclear weapons in its Kaliningrad enclave on the Baltic Sea in a bid to step up military pressure on NATO. Poland called on Thursday for an international inspection of Russian arms stores in the Kaliningrad enclave:
- Poland Wants Inspections In Kaliningrad, (by Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, January 5, 2001)
- U.S. Stirs Nuclear Jitters in Baltics, (The Moscow Times, January 5, 2001)
- A Nuclear Piano Under Bushes of Kaliningrad, - in Russian, (by Yekaterina Milovanova, Utro.Ru, January 5, 2001)
- Russians deny nuclear deployment to Baltic, (by Ian Traynor, Guardian, January 5, 2000)
- Poland angered as Russia deploys missiles, (by Richard Beeston, The Times, January 5, 2000)
- Russia Dismisses Fear of Baltic Nuclear Buildup, (by Reuters, Russia Today, January 5, 2001)
- Russian Military Forces in Kaliningrad Excessive, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, January 5, 2001)
- EU Believes Russia Moved No Nuclear Arms to Baltic, (by Reuters, Russia Today, January 5, 2001)
- Poland Calls for Inspection Over Kaliningrad Nukes, (by Reuters, Russia Today, January 5, 2001)
- The "Tactical Nuclear Weapons Scare" of 2001, (by Nikolay Sokov, CNS Report, January 4, 2001)
- A Prick Of A Nuclear Umbrella, - in Russian, (by Dmitri Starostin, Vesti.Ru, January 4, 2001)
- U.S. yet to query Moscow on nukes, (by Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, January 4, 2001)
- Russia Moving Warheads, (by Walter Pincus, The Washington Post, Thursday, January 4, 2001; Page A16)
- A Russian Base in the Baltics Is Reported to Have Nuclear Arms, (by The Associated Press, The New York Times, January 4, 2001)
- Nuclear Weapons Are Found in Kaliningrad, - in Russian, (by Maria Shaburova, Gazeta.Ru, January 4, 2001)
Russian Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov said on Saturday that Moscow would move quickly to establish a "serious dialogue" with the incoming administration of U.S. president-elect George W. Bush on missile defense:
- Russia Ready to Discuss NMD With New U.S. Administration, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, December 31, 2000)
- Russia Wants "Serious Dialogue" With Bush Administration, (by Reuters, Russia Today, December 30, 2000)
- The Voice of Russia Sounds More and More Confident in International Affairs, - in Russian, (by Igor Ivanov, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, December 30, 2000)
- Russia Set to Extend Missile Defense Talks With U.S., (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, December 29, 2000)
- Moscow in Unofficial Contacts With New U.S. Administration over NMD, (by Agence France Presse, Russia Today, December 28, 2000)
In picking his defense secretary, President-elect George W. Bush may have nudged Washington toward what could be a collision with Russia, China and U.S. allies over the thorny issue of national missile defense:
- To Run Pentagon, Bush Sought Proven Manager With Muscle, (by Eric Schmitt and Elaine Sciolino, The New York Times, January 1, 2001)
- "Another Bush's Hawk", - in Russian, (by Vladimir Tuchkov, Vesti.Ru December 31, 2000)
- He Woke Up As a Minister, - in Russian, (by Nikolay Zimin, Segodnya, December 30, 2000)
- Bush's Pentagon Choice Moves "Star Wars" Closer, (by Reuters, Russia Today, December 29, 2000)
- Choice of Rumsfeld Creates Solid Team for Missile Shield, (by Steven Lee Myers, The New York Times, December 29, 2000)
- Return Engagement at Defense, (The New York Times, December 29, 2000)
- The Cold Bush, - in Russian, (by Alexander Golts, Itogi, December 23, 2000)
On the eve of the New Year Russia deployed a new group of Topol-M missiles:
- "Topol-Ms" Instead of "Skalpels", - in Russian, (by Sergei Sokut, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, December 28, 2000)
- U.S. Sees New Russian Missiles As Treaty Compliance, (by Reuters, Russia Today, December 27, 2000)
- Russia Obtained More "Topols", - in Russian, (by Ivan Safronov, Kommersant, December 27, 2000)
- A New Year Tradition of the "Strategists", (by Alexander Dolinin, Krasnaya Zvezda, December 27, 2000)
- Shift Seen in Russian Nuclear Policy, (by David Hoffman, The Washington Post, Wednesday, December 27, 2000; Page A20)
- Russia Commissions New Topol-M Missiles, (by Reuters, Russia Today, December 26, 2000)
Only 26 of the originally deployed 176 ICBMs remain at Ukraine's soil. Colonel-General Vladimir Mikhtyuk, Commander of the 43-d Missile Army tells about START I implementation: Farewell to Arms, - in Russian, (by M. Romantsov, Segodnya, December 23, 2000)
In the December's issue of Arms Control Today:
- Time to Reason Why, (by Spurgeon M. Keeny, Jr.)
- Deadlocked and Waiting. At the UN Conference on Disarmament, - an interview of Ambassador Robert T. Grey, Jr.
- Understanding the Extraordinary Cost Of Missile Defense, (by David E. Mosher)
- Putin Calls for More Nuclear Cuts, Maintenance of ABM Treaty, (by Philipp C. Bleek)
- Statement of Russian President Putin On Strategic Reductions And Preservation of the ABM Treaty,
- U.S. and Soviet/Russian Strategic Nuclear Forces, - START I MOU data as of July 2000
In the recent issue of the The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists (January - February, 2001):
In the latest issue of Yadernoye Rasprostraneniye (July-September, 2000), published by the Moscow Carnegie Center:
- Where Her Majesty's weapons were, (by Richard Moore)
- Russia's blue water blues, (by Cristina Chuen & Michael Jasinski)
- National Security on the Internet
- On Ratification of the START II Treaty and Documents Related With the ABM Treaty of 1972 by the State Duma (by Alexander Tarasov)
- START III Treaty and the ABM Treaty in the Agenda of the Russian-U.S. Discussions, (by Gennadi Khromov)
- NMD and Consequences for Non-Proliferation Regime: A Japanese Point of View, (by Mitsuru Kurosava)
A Russian-American disarmament agreement to take 68 tons of plutonium out of nuclear weapons could have the unintended effect of increasing the chance of nuclear proliferation, according to a report by an independent researcher: Plutonium Pact With Russia Could Backfire, Critic Says, (by Matthew L. Wald, The New York Times, January 4, 2000).
A former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who conducted a comprehensive study of the nuclear test ban treaty at the request of President Clinton has concluded that the United States must ratify it in order to mount an effective campaign against the spread of nuclear weapons: Report to Clinton Asks U.S. to Ratify Test-Ban Treaty, (by Michael Gordon, The New York Times, January 5, 2001)
Experts continue discussion on the decision of the Russian State Duma to allow imports of spent nuclear fuel:
- Why Russia Wants Waste, (by Pavel Felgenhauer, The Moscow Times, January 4, 2000)
- A Nuclear Bomb for a Local War, - in Russian, (by Pavel Felgenhauer, Moskovskiye Novosti, December 26, 2000)
- Is Making Money On Nuclear Wastes A Good Thing?, - in Russian, (by Ol'ga Koleva, Vesti.Ru, December 21, 2000)
- Exposed Nuclear Fuel - What Is It?, - in Russian, an interview of Yevgeni Adamov, the Head of Minatom to "Mayak" radio station, December 23, 2000
Over 47,000 visitors made more than 240,000 requests of the START Web Site pages in 2000. The news page was the most popular one (17,400 requests). The most frequently visited publications in English include:
The most frequently visited publications in Russian can be found on the corresponding Russian page. See also statistics of the previous year.
- Russian Strategic Nuclear Weapons, (November 1998, 7860 req.)
- Submarine Collision off Murmansk: A Look from Afar (April 1998, 5760 req.)
- Future of Russia's Strategic Nuclear Forces: Discussions and Arguments (April 1998, 2590 req.)
- Collision of Two U.S. Nuclear Powered Submarines on March 19, 1998. Our Comment (March 1998, 2430 req.)
- A Letter of Prof. Theodore A. Postol to John D. Podesta, the White House Chief of Staff, (PDF format), May 2000 (2280 req)
- Preventing Submarine Collisions, (November 1998, 1680 req.)
At the Russian START Forum: on deployment of TNWs in the Kaliningrad Region, US-Russian strategic parity, feasibility of deployment of ballistic missiles at sea bed and other issues.
What Was New?
In 2000: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 1999: January | February | March | April | May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December
In 1998: January | February | March | April | May | June | July-September | October | November | December
In 1997: November | December
Search the START Web Site
© Center for Arms Control, Energy and Environmental Studies at MIPT, 1999